YorkSpace

YorkSpace is York University's Institutional Repository. It supports York University's Senate Policy on Open Access by providing York community members with a place to preserve their research online in an institutional context.

Photo by NASA on Unsplash

Communities in YorkSpace

Select a community to browse its collections.

Now showing 1 - 63 of 63

Recent Submissions

  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type: Item , Access status: Open Access ,
    Afghanistan Shows the U.S. Folly of Trying to Implant Democratic Institutions in Abroad.
    (Academic Journalism Society, 2021-09-29) Karimi, Sirvan
    The rapid conquest of Kabul in Afghanistan and the triumphant seizure of power by the Taliban triggered shock waves throughout the world.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type: Item , Access status: Open Access ,
    The Appeals and the Limits of Digital Education in the Post-Covid Era
    (2021-06-28) Karimi, Sirvan
    Though shifting to online teaching and learning has been a persistent trend for the last two decades, remotely delivered teaching has become a pervasive and ubiquitous worldwide phenomenon during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is no misgiving that the staggering impact of COVID-19 on education sector will cement e-learning as an indispensable ingredient of the traditional teaching and learning system. The intensification of the shift to digital teaching and learning is alleged to have the potential to reduce educational costs, diminish bargaining leverage of faculty and teachers’ unions in the education sector, and enhance learning capacity of students. Contrary to the views of ardent exponents of online teaching and learning, it can be demonstrated that e-learning neither reduces educational costs nor can it undermine the bargaining leverage of faculty and teachers’ unions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type: Item , Access status: Open Access ,
    Comparing the Politicization of COVID-19 and the Great Depression
    (2020-06-28) Karimi, Sirvan
    The COVID-19 pandemic has set in motion a seismic wave of consternation, anxiety, and trepidation. The crisis has provided a fertile ground for the proliferation of books, articles, and case studies across different academic disciplines. While most attention has concentrated on the analysis of the economic, social and psychological impacts of the pandemic, less attention has been paid to the emergence of an environment within which responses to the crisis are politicized by governments, political parties and politicians in order to enhance their electability. Furthermore, the politicization of the response to COVID-19 is to a great extent shaped by political expediency, not ideological orientation. Some have already attempted to compare the COVID-19 crisis and the Great Depression of the 1930s (see Fishback 2020; Gumede 2020; and Smith, 2020). Though the forces behind the economic crash of the 1930s and the recent economic shutdowns emanated from different sources, the politicization of responses to both crises emerges as a common trend.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type: Item , Access status: Open Access ,
    Canada could benefit from Trump challenges
    (Institute for Research on Public Policy, 2017-07-17) Karimi, Sirvan
    Canada has an opportunity to bring in, through immigration, the best and brightest students and academics who are alienated by Trump’s policies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type: Item , Access status: Open Access ,
    Implementing the Inter-agency Standing Committee Guidelines on Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Humanitarian Action: A Scoping Review
    (Springer, 2026-05-06) Dijkzeul, Dennis; Dempf, Sebastian; Göker, Sena; Funke, Carolin
    The 2016 World Humanitarian Summit promoted the development of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee’s "Guidelines on Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Humanitarian Action." These guidelines offer humanitarian actors practical information, enabling them to identify and respond to the needs, rights, and specific requirements of persons with disabilities, while taking their capacities into account. They outline the four “must-do” actions (MDAs) in humanitarian programming: (1) promote meaningful participation; (2) remove barriers; (3) empower persons with disabilities; support them to develop their capacities; and (4) disaggregate data for monitoring inclusion. This qualitative scoping review explores the specific role and (the degree of) impact of the "IASC Guidelines" and their MDAs on humanitarian practice. Our findings show that these guidelines bring together, build on, and reinforce earlier research. They also suggest that practical evidence of what does and does not work across humanitarian sectors and contexts is still limited. Interestingly, grey literature by humanitarian organizations pays more attention to the four MDAs than scholarly work. Greater awareness and application of the "IASC Guidelines," particularly their four MDAs, are needed for meaningful progress towards more disability inclusive humanitarian action. This article also discusses issues for further research in this respect.