Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBevilacqua, Christine M.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Parbudyal
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-24T20:28:53Z
dc.date.available2010-11-24T20:28:53Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationBevilacqua, C., & Singh, P. (2009). Pay for performance – panacea or Pandora’s box? Revisiting an old debate in a new economic environment. Compensation and Benefits Review, 41(5), 20-26.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/6299
dc.description.abstractNew research in neuroeconomics suggests that money may be a more powerful motivator than previously thought, with important implications for incentive pay programs.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSAGEen
dc.subjectCompensation designen
dc.subjectNeuroeconomicsen
dc.subjectIncentivesen
dc.subjectPay for performanceen
dc.titlePay for performance - panacea or Pandora's box? Revisiting an old debate in the current economic environmenten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.rights.articlehttp://cbr.sagepub.com/content/41/5/20.abstracten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.