Pay for performance - panacea or Pandora's box? Revisiting an old debate in the current economic environment

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBevilacqua, Christine M.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Parbudyal
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-24T20:28:53Z
dc.date.available2010-11-24T20:28:53Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractNew research in neuroeconomics suggests that money may be a more powerful motivator than previously thought, with important implications for incentive pay programs.en
dc.identifier.citationBevilacqua, C., & Singh, P. (2009). Pay for performance – panacea or Pandora’s box? Revisiting an old debate in a new economic environment. Compensation and Benefits Review, 41(5), 20-26.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/6299
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0886368709341860
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSAGEen
dc.rights.articlehttp://cbr.sagepub.com/content/41/5/20.abstracten
dc.subjectCompensation designen
dc.subjectNeuroeconomicsen
dc.subjectIncentivesen
dc.subjectPay for performanceen
dc.titlePay for performance - panacea or Pandora's box? Revisiting an old debate in the current economic environmenten
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
HRM0018.pdf
Size:
1.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

School of Human Resource Management

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.