Pay for performance - panacea or Pandora's box? Revisiting an old debate in the current economic environment
| dc.contributor.author | Bevilacqua, Christine M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Singh, Parbudyal | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-11-24T20:28:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-11-24T20:28:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.description.abstract | New research in neuroeconomics suggests that money may be a more powerful motivator than previously thought, with important implications for incentive pay programs. | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bevilacqua, C., & Singh, P. (2009). Pay for performance – panacea or Pandora’s box? Revisiting an old debate in a new economic environment. Compensation and Benefits Review, 41(5), 20-26. | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10315/6299 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368709341860 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | SAGE | en |
| dc.rights.article | http://cbr.sagepub.com/content/41/5/20.abstract | en |
| dc.subject | Compensation design | en |
| dc.subject | Neuroeconomics | en |
| dc.subject | Incentives | en |
| dc.subject | Pay for performance | en |
| dc.title | Pay for performance - panacea or Pandora's box? Revisiting an old debate in the current economic environment | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |