YorkSpace has migrated to a new version of its software. Access our Help Resources to learn how to use the refreshed site. Contact diginit@yorku.ca if you have any questions about the migration.
 

Repeated measures ANOVA: some new results on comparing trimmed means and means

dc.contributor.authorWilcox, Rand
dc.contributor.authorKeselman, H. J.
dc.contributor.authorMuska, Jan
dc.contributor.authorCribbie, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-04T19:18:19Z
dc.date.available2018-06-04T19:18:19Z
dc.date.issued2000-05
dc.description.abstractThis paper considers the common problem of testing the equality of means in a repeated measures design. Recent results indicate that practical problems can arise when computing confidence intervals for all pairwise differences of the means in conjunction with the Bonferroni inequality. This suggests, and is confirmed here, that a problem might occur when performing an omnibus test of equal means. The problem is that the probability of rejecting is not minimized when the means are equal and the usual univariate F test is used with the Huynh‐Feldt correction (ε) for the degrees of freedom. That is, power can actually decrease as the mean of one group is lowered, although eventually it increases. A similar problem is found when using a multivariate method (Hotelling's T2). Moreover, the probability of a Type I error can exceed the nominal level by a large amount. The paper considers methods for correcting this problem, and new results on comparing trimmed means are reported as well. In terms of both Type I errors and power, simulations reported here suggest that a percentile t bootstrap used with 20% trimmed means and an analogue of the ε‐adjusted F gives the best results. This is consistent with extant theoretical results comparing methods based on means with trimmed means.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council
dc.identifier.citationWilcox, R. R., Keselman, H. J., Muska, J. & Cribbie, R. (2000). Repeated measures ANOVA: Some new results on comparing trimmed means and means. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 69-82. doi: 10.1348/000711000159187
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1348/000711000159187en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/34610
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rights.articlehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1348/000711000159187
dc.subjectrepeated measuresen_US
dc.subjectomnibus testen_US
dc.subjecttrimmed meanen_US
dc.titleRepeated measures ANOVA: some new results on comparing trimmed means and means
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
_rep_anova_trimming_wilcox_keselman_muska_cribbie_bjmsp.pdf
Size:
166.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: