dc.contributor.author	Bichler, Shimshon
dc.contributor.author	Nitzan, Jonathan
dc.date.accessioned	2023-02-14T15:25:53Z
dc.date.available	2023-02-14T15:25:53Z
dc.date.issued	2023
dc.description.abstract	In a recent article, Nicolas D. Villarreal claims that our empirical analysis of the relation between business power and industrial sabotage in the United States is unpersuasive, if not deliberately misleading. Specifically, he argues that we cherry-pick specific data definitions and smoothing windows to ‘achieve the desired results’; that these ‘results are driven by statistical aberrations’; and that his own choice of variables pretty much invalidates our conclusions. In this brief response, we offer an easy-to-follow, step-by-step reply to his complaints.	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	The Business of Strategic Sabotage. Bichler, Shimshon and Nitzan, Jonathan. (2023). Review of Capital as Power. Vol. 2. No. 2. January. pp. 81-95. (Article - Journal; English).	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10315/40877
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Review of Capital as Power	en_US
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International	*
dc.rights.article	https://capitalaspower.com/2023/01/bichler-nitzan-the-business-of-strategic-sabotage-2/	en_US
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.subject	Business	en_US
dc.subject	Capital as power	en_US
dc.subject	Capital income	en_US
dc.subject	Industry	en_US
dc.subject	Sabotage	en_US
dc.subject	Unemployment	en_US
dc.subject	Thorstein Veblen	en_US
dc.title	The Business of Strategic Sabotage	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US

The Business of Strategic Sabotage

Files

Original bundle

License bundle

Collections