YorkSpace has migrated to a new version of its software. Access our Help Resources to learn how to use the refreshed site. Contact diginit@yorku.ca if you have any questions about the migration.
 

Orangutan Vision, Looking Preferences, and Passive Looking-Time Versus Active Touchscreen Paradigms

dc.contributor.advisorMacDonald, Suzanne
dc.creatorAdams, Laura Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-02T16:28:19Z
dc.date.available2019-07-02T16:28:19Z
dc.date.copyright2019-04-22
dc.date.issued2019-07-02
dc.date.updated2019-07-02T16:28:19Z
dc.degree.disciplinePsychology(Functional Area: Developmental & Cognitive Processes)
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.description.abstractKey aspects of orangutan picture preference, looking paradigms, and vision were assessed in three manuscripts. These studies have important contributions to research on comparative vision and animal picture perception, as well as practical applications for orangutan research. The first manuscript assessed visual preferences for pictures of primates. Orangutan looking-time was coded as they watched simultaneous slideshows on two laptop computers. Orangutans preferred photographs of unfamiliar orangutans over unfamiliar humans, and familiar orangutans over unfamiliar orangutans. When comparing familiar orangutans, they preferred adults over infants, and males over females. These preferences were then compared to preferences reported across primates which show variable results, likely due to complex social factors and context. A second manuscript assessed passive looking-time and active touchscreen paradigms. Passive and active paradigms can produce discrepant results, and the validity of these paradigms had not been empirically assessed in animals. Three methods were compared: looking-time at slideshows on two laptops, a touchscreen that displayed pictures when touched, and simply holding up pairs of printed images. All three methods detected the expected preference for pictures of animals over non-animals. This can be considered evidence of the reliability of these paradigms, equivalence of passive and active methods, and support for continued use of looking-time and touchscreens in orangutan research. The final manuscript assessed the contrast sensitivity function (CSF). Orangutans were trained to select vertical or horizontal lines, and then the CSF threshold was estimated by increasing the spatial frequency and decreasing the contrast of the stimuli. Orangutan CSF was similar in shape and position on the frequency scale to those of humans and macaques, but overall sensitivity was lower. We propose that this was due to testing conditions and low motivation. Across these three manuscripts orangutans demonstrated overall vision and looking behaviour that was similar to humans, however with high variability likely due to competing interests, low motivation, and individual differences.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/36343
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subject.keywordsOrangutan
dc.subject.keywordsperception
dc.subject.keywordscontrast sensitivity
dc.subject.keywordsspatial frequency
dc.subject.keywordssensory ecology
dc.subject.keywordspicture perception
dc.subject.keywordsprimate
dc.subject.keywordspreference
dc.subject.keywordsphotograph perception
dc.subject.keywordslooking time
dc.subject.keywordstouchscreen
dc.subject.keywordsactive versus passive
dc.subject.keywordscomparative cognition
dc.titleOrangutan Vision, Looking Preferences, and Passive Looking-Time Versus Active Touchscreen Paradigms
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Adams_Laura_C_2019_PhD.pdf
Size:
1.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
YorkU_ETDlicense.txt
Size:
3.39 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.87 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: