FES Outstanding Graduate Student Paper Series
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing FES Outstanding Graduate Student Paper Series by Subject "Adaptation"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Offshore Oil and Marine Protected Areas: Stakeholders, Conflicts and Future Directions in Nova Scotia, Canada(2020) Kapoor, Anuja; Fraser, GailNova Scotia is invested in expanding hydrocarbon exploration offshore to boost its economy. A call for bids is carried out by the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board every year to award licenses to operators for exploration through a competitive bidding process. But offshore petroleum expansion competes for space in one of the most productive Atlantic coastal regions. Nova Scotia leads seafood exports in the country (valued at $2 billion) and a growing network of protected areas support an immense diversity of marine life. There is a complex interplay of actors in the region. Map of the Scotian shelf (King and MacLean, 1974).1 1 King, L. H. & MacLean, B. (1974). Geology of the Scotian Shelf and Adjacent Areas. 1:1,000,000. In Marine Sciences Paper Series No. 7 G.S.C. Paper No. 74-31. First edition. Ottawa: Canadian Hydrological Service. iii With a view to understand the tensions and trade-offs between marine conservation and development, and associated actors, policies and governance, I focus on the call for bids process. Any future activity in the region depends on this critical decision point. Which marine users, and to what extent, are involved in decision-making? Has the process changed over time? Does conflict arise where call for bids are close to protected areas and fishing grounds? To what extent is conflict mitigated or resolved, and in what ways? What role can marine spatial planning play to achieve sustainable outcomes? This was a collaborative research project aimed at addressing these questions through a qualitative study involving 25 marine stakeholders. Dr. Fraser and I conducted most of the interviews together in Nova Scotia, Ottawa and online. After discussions with Drs. Fraser and Carter about the analysis, I undertook the N-Vivo analysis and wrote the two articles that are my major paper (in manuscript format for separate journals). Drs. Fraser and Carter provided comments on those drafts. The first paper examines case studies of overlap between conservation and extractive resource development. The second, evaluates the effectiveness of Strategic Environmental Assessments, used to inform licensing decisions and to mitigate conflict in early stages of planning. Both articles address stakeholder difficulties and room for improvement. Marine spatial planning is discussed as a process to appease extractive resource conflicts, but it is still quite early to tell whether it will.Item Open Access Planning for what nature, in whose city? Climate resilience and ecological imaginaries in the Port Lands Flood Protection Project(2022-04-30) Alan Trumble; Jennifer FosterThis paper examines the Port Lands Flood Protection Project, a flood mitigation, ecological naturalization, and climate change adaptation project located in Toronto, Canada’s Port Lands area. Previously a site of post-industrial economic decline, ecological dysfunction, and flood risk, the area is being remade into a modern mixed-use neighbourhood with a newly constructed river estuary and a significantly increased area of naturalized habitat and recreational green space. Drawing from research on climate change resilience, urban political ecology, restoration ecology, and public participation theory, this paper investigates how the contemporary ecological imaginaries of the Port Lands emerged, how they have defined and influenced the course of the Port Lands Flood Protection Project, and what actors and interests have directed and been served by these developments. This research finds that the planning and implementation of the Port Lands Flood Protection Project has been defined by a series of compromises made by the project’s proponents between competing imperatives of ecological restoration and economic development, and between demands for public participation and the directives of government and private sector partners. While the project is a remarkable improvement on the state of the Port Lands, the compromises that have defined the project’s direction also threaten to undermine aspects of the project’s democratic legitimacy and its ability to produce long-term resilience in the area.