Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrace, Sherry
dc.contributor.authorHerdy, Artur H.
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Danielle Aparecida Gomes
dc.contributor.authorJimenez, Francisco Lopez
dc.contributor.authorPesah, Ella
dc.contributor.authorChaves, Gabriela Suéllen da Silva
dc.contributor.authorTurk-Adawi, Karam
dc.contributor.authorSupervia, Marta
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-10T16:46:17Z
dc.date.available2021-05-10T16:46:17Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Journal of Physical Therapy Volume 24, Issue 2, March–April 2020, Pages 167-176en_US
dc.identifier.issn1413-3555
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.02.011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/38313
dc.description.abstractBackground: Brazil has insufficient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) capacity, yet density and regional variation in unmet need is unknown. Moreover, South America has CR guidelines, but whether delivery conforms has not been characterized. This study aimed to establish: (1) CR volumes and density, and (2) the nature of programs, and (3) compare these by: (a) Brazilian region and (b) to other upper middle-income countries (upper-MICs). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a survey was administered to CR programs globally. Cardiac associations were engaged to facilitate program identification. Density was computed using Global Burden of Disease study ischemic heart disease (IHD) incidence estimates. Results were compared to data from the 29 upper-MICs with CR (N=249 programs). Results: CR was available in all 5 regions (only one program in North), with 30/75 programs initiating a survey (40.0% program response rate). There was only one CR spot for every 99 IHD patient. Most programs were funded by government/hospital sources (n=16, 53.3%), but in 11 programs (36.7%) patients depended on private health insurance. Guideline-indicated conditions were accepted in ≥70% of programs. Programs had a team of 3.8±1.9 staff (versus 5.9±2.8 in other upper-MICs, p<0.05), offering 4.0±1.6/10core components (versus 6.0±1.5in other upper-MICs, p<0.01; more tobacco cessation and return-to-work counselling needed in particular) over 44.5 sessions/patient (Q25-75=29-65) vs 32 sessions/patient (Q25-75=15-40) in other upper-MICs (p<0.01). Conclusion: Brazilian CR capacity must be augmented, but where available, services are consistent across regions, but differ from other upper-MICs in terms of staff size and core components delivered.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsElsevier Journals © <2020>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectavailabilityen_US
dc.subjecthealth servicesen_US
dc.subjectupper-middle income countryen_US
dc.titleCardiac rehabilitation availability and delivery in Brazil: a comparison to other upper middle-income countriesen_US
dc.title.alternativeShort title: Cardiac Rehabilitation in Brazilen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.journalhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/brazilian-journal-of-physical-therapyen_US
dc.rights.publisherhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/en_US
dc.rights.articlehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1413355518309456en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Elsevier Journals 
© <2020>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Elsevier Journals © <2020>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/