Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMcNally, David J.
dc.creatorGray, Paul Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-27T16:27:53Z
dc.date.available2018-08-27T16:27:53Z
dc.date.copyright2016-04-18
dc.date.issued2018-08-27
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/34948
dc.description.abstractIn 'The Tragedy of Marx and Justice: A Critique of Marxs Failed Attempt to Dispense with Principles of Justice,' I critique Marxs belief that his theory of history, as well as the socialist society it would help to bring about, are beyond the need for justice. Although there have been three waves of debate about the relation between Marxism and ethics (1890-1900s; 1950-70s; 1970-90s), no one has yet provided the definitive interpretation of Marx on the question of justice. Furthermore, each of these debates ended in the same basic impasse between consequentialism and deontology, both of which Marx explicitly rejects. This occurred for three reasons. First, they misinterpreted Marxs immanent critique, which demonstrates how capitalism systematically contradicts its own principles. I explore Marxs use of this method with regard to principles of justice. Second, they not only neglected the use of immanent critique in Marx, but also of Marx. They do not critique him according to his own standards. They fail to subject Marx to a historical materialist critique which roots his evasive relation to justice in the transformations of the theory and practice of justice in the transitions to capitalism. I discuss the major aspects of these transformations, the most important of which is the devaluation of justice relative to the ethical systems of non-capitalist class societies. I contend that Marxs dismissal of justice is an uncritical absorption of the capitalist social relations that, otherwise, he did so much to critique. Third, the debates tended to focus on one or another aspect of justice, and in particular, the question of exploitation. Conversely, I argue that we need a comprehensive theory of justice that includes commutative justice, distributive justice, corrective justice, and complete justice. Only then can we appreciate the full ethical implications of the silence on justice in Marx and many Marxisms. Indeed, this more robust theory is necessary if justice is to be not only a principle of judgement by which we assign praise or blame, but also as a guide to activity, especially for those who aspire to something as dangerous as dramatic societal transformation.
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectPolitical Science
dc.titleThe Tragedy of Marx and Justice: A Critique of Marx's Failed Attempt to Dispense with Principles of Justice
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.degree.disciplinePolitical Science
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.date.updated2018-08-27T16:27:53Z
dc.subject.keywordsMarx
dc.subject.keywordsMarxism
dc.subject.keywordsEthics
dc.subject.keywordsJustice
dc.subject.keywordsPolitical Theory
dc.subject.keywordsPolitical Philosophy
dc.subject.keywordsPhilosophy
dc.subject.keywordsMoral Philosophy
dc.subject.keywordsConsequentialism
dc.subject.keywordsDeontology
dc.subject.keywordsSocialism
dc.subject.keywordsCapitalism
dc.subject.keywordsCommunism
dc.subject.keywordsDialectic
dc.subject.keywordsImmanent Critique
dc.subject.keywordsHegel
dc.subject.keywordsKant
dc.subject.keywordsCommutative Justice
dc.subject.keywordsDistributive Justice
dc.subject.keywordsCorrective Justice
dc.subject.keywordsComplete Justice


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.