Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLehrer, Ute A.
dc.contributor.authorSantiago, Ryanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-24T20:12:44Z
dc.date.available2018-07-24T20:12:44Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierMESMP02824
dc.identifier.citationMajor Paper, Master of Environmental Studies, Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/34837
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores the relationship between community members and planners in Toronto as notions of “good planning” are formed, and how a prevailing interpretation of “good planning” that is born from this relationship shapes Toronto’s urban landscape. The redevelopment of Toronto’s West Queen West Triangle (WQWT) from 2005-2008, with special attention to the efforts of the community organization Active 18, is used as a case study to explore how good planning principles are differentially informed by knowledge from community members relative to professional or expert knowledge. Two main questions guide the analysis of this case study: (1) How did the efforts of Active 18 help define and interpret “good planning” policy, and (2) how do the material impacts of their efforts fulfill the expectations of “good planning” as set out during the WQWT’s redevelopment between 2005-2008?en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.titleActive 18 & The West Queen West Triangle: A Case Study In The Politics Of "Good Planning"
dc.typeMajor Paper
dc.subject.keywordsCommunity
dc.subject.keywordsRedevelopment
dc.subject.keywordsPlacemaking
dc.subject.keywordsGovernance
dc.subject.keywordsInfrastructure


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.