Equivalence based tests of clinical significance: Assessing treatments for depression
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Treatment efficacy is largely determined by statistical significance testing, and clinical significance testing is often used to quantify or qualify the efficacy of a treatment at the individual or group level. This study applies the equivalence based clinical significance model proposed by Kendall, Marrs-Garcia, Nath and Sheldrick (1999), and a revised model proposed by Cribbie and Arpin-Cribbie (2009), to the assessment of treatments for depression. Using several studies that investigated treatments for depression, we tested whether the post-treatment means were equivalent to the means for a similar normal comparison group. All of the studies had significant improvement from pretest to posttest, although for many of the studies the treated group was not equivalent to a normal comparison group at posttest. Further, there are important differences between the conclusions drawn from the Kendall et al. and Cribbie and Arpin-Cribbie methods for assessing equivalence based clinical significance.