Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAllen Dauphinée, Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2008-08-20T20:11:15Z
dc.date.available2008-08-20T20:11:15Z
dc.date.issued2001-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/1380
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.yorku.ca/yciss/publications/OP68-Dauphinee.pdf
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to contribute to a critical understanding of the implications of the Ottawa Convention through an assessment of the ways in which agency, intentionality, and legitimacy are woven into the discourse surrounding the ban treaty. It is hoped that through a problematisation of the discursive and conceptual limitations of the Ottawa Convention, the agenda and targets of the ban might at the very least be broadened to include other categories of weapons that perform and devastate in the same ways as AP landmines. At best, it is hoped that this paper will stimulate critical thinking about militarisation and state-centric security practices more generally, and will call into question those particular underlying norms that give rise to discursive constructions of states and state interests, militaries, and weapons usage as unproblematically ‘necessary.’en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherYCISSen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOccasional Paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseries68en
dc.rights.urihttp://www.yorku.ca/yciss/
dc.subjectlandminesen
dc.subjectban processen
dc.subjectweapons useen
dc.titleBroadening the Ban: Limitations of Agency, Intentionality, and Legitimacy in the Ottawa Conventionen
dc.typeOtheren


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.