Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation Dose on Mortality and Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis

dc.contributor.authorSantiago de AraújoPio, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorMarzolini, Susan
dc.contributor.authorKin, R.
dc.contributor.authorPakosh, Maureen
dc.contributor.authorGrace, Sherry
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-28T16:07:43Z
dc.date.available2021-01-28T16:07:43Z
dc.date.issued2017-11
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To ascertain the effect of CR dose (i.e., duration x frequency/week; categorized as low [<12 sessions], medium [12-35], or high [≥36]) on mortality and morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Cochrane, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and MEDLINE databases were systematically searched from inception through November30,2015. Inclusion criteria included randomized or non-randomized studies, with a minimum CR dose ≥4, and presence of a control/comparison group. Citations were considered for inclusion, and data were extracted in included studies independently by 2 investigators. Studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis, and meta-regression where warranted(covariates included study quality, country, publication year, and diagnosis).RESULTS: Of 4630 unique citations, 33 trials were included comparing CR to usual care (i.e., no dose).In meta-regression, greater dose was significantly related to lower all-cause mortality (high= -.77, Standard Error [SE]=.22, P<.001; medium=-0.80,SE=0.21, P<.001), when compared to low dose. With regard to morbidity, meta-analysis showed dose was significantly associated with less percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; high: RR=.65, 95% CI .50-.84, and medium/low: RR=1.04, 95% CI .74-1.48; P=.03).This was also significant in meta-regression (high vs. medium/low=-.73, SE=.20, P<.001). Publication bias was not evident. No dose-response association was found for cardiovascular mortality, all-cause hospitalization, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION:A minimum of 36 CR sessions may be needed to reduce PCI. Future studies should examine the effect of actual dose of CR, and trials are needed comparing different doses.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMayo Clinic Proceedings Volume 92, Issue 11, November 2017, Pages 1644-1659en_US
dc.identifier.issn0025-6196
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.07.019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/38072
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsElsevier Journals © <2017>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.articlehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0025619617306419en_US
dc.rights.journalhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/mayo-clinic-proceedingsen_US
dc.rights.publisherhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleEffect of Cardiac Rehabilitation Dose on Mortality and Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10.1016.j.mayocp.2017.07.019.pdf.txt
Size:
1.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: