The Journal of Comparative Psychology (JCP): A Network Analysis of the Status of Comparative Psychology

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorGreen, Christopher Darren
dc.creatorLahham, Daniel Elias
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-14T21:25:41Z
dc.date.available2014-07-14T21:25:41Z
dc.date.copyright2014-01-21
dc.date.issued2014-07-09
dc.date.updated2014-07-09T16:33:10Z
dc.degree.disciplinePsychology (Functional Area: History and Theory)
dc.degree.levelMaster's
dc.degree.nameMA - Master of Arts
dc.description.abstractAbstract Comparative psychology‟s relationship to various other sub-disciplines and scientific “movements” has been discussed by many scholars throughout its history. The majority of these analyses took the form of frequency counts of the different subject species used within scientific periodicals (Schneirla, 1946; Beach, 1950; Dukes, 1960; Lockard, 1971) and presented similar conclusions: rats were the most commonly researched organism and the study of learning was the key to understanding behavior. The most popular of these critiques was Frank Ambrose Beach‟s “The Snark was a Boojum” (1950). Beach argued that comparative psychology, with the advent of behaviorism, slowly became a discipline focused only on rat learning in mazes. Donald Dewsbury (1984) responded to these discussions claiming that frequency counts alone could not depict the success and failures of the comparative discipline. Instead, he argued that comparative psychology maintained a historically continuous tradition of excellence off the efforts of a small group of prominent comparative psychologists. In this study, I attempted to “bridge” the gap between these two competing views of the comparative discipline in order to view the legitimacy of both claims. Using network analysis, a tool common to digital history, I investigated metadata (organism studied, scientist, institution) from the Journal of Comparative Psychology during the period of 1911 to 1950. I found that both arguments were partially correct in their assertions. Comparative research was being conducted by a small group of prominent scientists throughout the entire four-decade period on many more species other than the rat; however, the broader comparative discipline was heavily impacted by the influx of research on learning in rats. In both cases, the authors inadvertently focused solely on their own claims, and failed to recognize the validity of the other.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/27628
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectAnimal sciencesen_US
dc.subjectHistory of scienceen_US
dc.subject.keywordsNeobehaviorismen_US
dc.subject.keywordsJournal of Comparative Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsBeachen_US
dc.subject.keywordsDewsburyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsYerkesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsRaten_US
dc.subject.keywordsNetworksen_US
dc.subject.keywordsDigital historyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsHistory of comparative psychologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsPsycho-biologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsBehaviorismen_US
dc.subject.keywordsComparative psycho-biologyen_US
dc.titleThe Journal of Comparative Psychology (JCP): A Network Analysis of the Status of Comparative Psychologyen_US
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lahham_Daniel_E_2014_Masters.pdf
Size:
1.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
YorkU_ETDlicense.txt
Size:
3.38 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Psychology (Functional Area: History and Theory)

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.