Can Immigration Detention Ever Be in the Best Interests of the Child? The Detention of Unaccompanied Minors in Europe Under International and European Law

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Milano, Valentina

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Universidad de Jaén

Abstract

This article analyses how law and judicial practice on the detention of unaccompanied migrant children in Europe reflect a fundamental tension between migration policies and children’s rights. At the universal level, interpretation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child has evolved toward a substantive prohibition of migration-related child detention. Yet this development remains only partially internalised in Europe. EU law still permits detention as an exceptional measure, while the EU Pact risks expanding de facto detention. Meanwhile, the Committee on the Rights on the Child addresses this issue inconsistently in its case law and the ECtHR condemns harmful conditions but avoids declaring a general ban. These inconsistencies contribute to the normalisation of a practice increasingly rejected under international human rights law.

Description

This article is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY license.

Keywords

Immigration detention, Child detention, Best interests of the child, CRC, ECHR, EU Pact on migration and asylum, Unaccompanied minors, Unaccompanied children

Citation

Milano, V. (2026). Can Immigration Detention Ever Be in the Best Interests of the Child? The Detention of Unaccompanied Minors in Europe Under International and European Law. The Age of Human Rights Journal, 27, e10292. https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v27.10292