Resisting Obsolescence: A Comprehensive Study of Canada's Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner and the Office's Efforts to Innovate While Strategically Asserting Greater Independence
dc.contributor.advisor | Sossin, Lorne | |
dc.contributor.author | Stedman, Ian Norris Kellner | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-11T12:53:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-11T12:53:34Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-05-11 | |
dc.date.updated | 2020-05-11T12:53:34Z | |
dc.degree.discipline | Law | |
dc.degree.level | Doctoral | |
dc.degree.name | PhD - Doctor of Philosophy | |
dc.description.abstract | In 2017, Justin Trudeau become the first Prime Minister to be found in violation of Canadas parliamentary ethics laws. This incident alone demonstrated the need for a comprehensive study of the Canadian parliamentary ethics regime. The Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner (COIEC) who administers this regime is broadly recognized as belonging in a category of parliamentary institutions called agents of parliament. The COIEC is the only one of nine such agents who denies that it should be categorized as an agent. Instead, the COIEC argues it is an Officer of the House of Commons a category that is heretofore unrecognized. Given the heightened interest in public sector ethics that has emerged, this dissertation analyzes what this Canadian institution is, how it works, where it belongs, what its limitations are and why. This is a unique institution whose design sets it apart from the recognized agents of parliament. The COIEC is responsible for two mandates: one (the Act) is legislative and the other (the Code) is a non-legislative mandate. Work under the Code is explicitly protected by parliamentary privilege, which shields it from judicial scrutiny. This allows the COIEC to exercise a level of independence from government and Parliament that is otherwise unprecedented among agents. I argue that the COIEC cannot be properly characterized as either an agent or an officer of either Parliament or the House of Commons as a result, and that this institutional design has allowed the COIEC to intentionally blend the administration of the two regimes. This blending of regimes has contributed to a strong assertion of operational independence that has been exacerbated by Parliaments reluctance to engage with the Office in good faith in relation to the many recommendations its commissioners have made towards the improvement of both the Act and Code. I explain the implications this has for the COIECs constitutional legitimacy and offer recommendations for how the mandates might be reformed and more thoughtfully delegated by Parliament. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10315/37465 | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.rights | Author owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests. | |
dc.subject | Ethics | |
dc.subject.keywords | Parliamentary ethics | |
dc.subject.keywords | Conflicts of interest | |
dc.subject.keywords | Agents of parliament | |
dc.subject.keywords | Officers of parliament | |
dc.subject.keywords | Members of parliament | |
dc.subject.keywords | Public sector scandals | |
dc.subject.keywords | Public sector ethics | |
dc.subject.keywords | Ethics | |
dc.subject.keywords | Conflict of interest commissioner | |
dc.subject.keywords | Ethics commissioner | |
dc.subject.keywords | Conflict of interest and ethics commissioner | |
dc.subject.keywords | Ethics counsellor | |
dc.subject.keywords | Assistant deputy registrar general | |
dc.subject.keywords | Institutional design | |
dc.subject.keywords | Parliamentary privilege | |
dc.subject.keywords | Trudeau | |
dc.subject.keywords | Trump | |
dc.subject.keywords | Ethics scandals | |
dc.subject.keywords | Public administration | |
dc.subject.keywords | Codes of conduct | |
dc.subject.keywords | Ethics codes | |
dc.subject.keywords | Watching and controlling | |
dc.subject.keywords | House of commons | |
dc.subject.keywords | Mary Dawson | |
dc.subject.keywords | Mario Dion | |
dc.subject.keywords | Accountability | |
dc.subject.keywords | Transparency. | |
dc.title | Resisting Obsolescence: A Comprehensive Study of Canada's Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner and the Office's Efforts to Innovate While Strategically Asserting Greater Independence | |
dc.type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Stedman_Ian_NK_2019_PhD.pdf
- Size:
- 2.16 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format