Mediating Public Science: Experts, Politics, and Climate Change in the News Media in Canada

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorAlsop, Steven John
dc.creatorIsopp, Bernhard Isaac
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-05T14:52:00Z
dc.date.available2019-03-05T14:52:00Z
dc.date.copyright2018-10-12
dc.date.issued2019-03-05
dc.date.updated2019-03-05T14:52:00Z
dc.degree.disciplineScience & Technology Studies
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.description.abstractThis project offers a reconstructionist science and technology studies (STS) analysis of climate change coverage in three Canadian newspapers, the Globe and Mail, the National Post, and the Toronto Star from 2006 to 2013. It employs a combination of framing, critical discourse, and philosophical analyses to address two core questions: (1) Why has climate change been represented in these newspapers in the ways it has? (2) What effects have these newspapers had in shaping issues of climate change? These broad inquiries are organised by a set of six more specific conceptual concerns stemming from STS: i) How do scientists relate, engage, and compete with other actors in influencing climate change coverage? ii) To what extent can these newspapers be understood as a site of scientific practice, communication, and knowledge production? iii) What broader social, political, and economic factors are linked to the competing representations of climate change and actor coalitions that emerge in these newspapers? iv) What broader images, ideologies, and philosophies of science and scientists shape and emerge from these media discourses? v) What do STS conceptions of scientific rhetoric suggest about these discourses? vi) How is the authority of science and scientists established, affected, challenged, and undermined through and by all these interacting influences and processes? While the answers to these questions are multifaceted, the authority of science is a culminating theme. Here there is ambivalence: concerned and sceptical voices in these newspapers accuse each other of politicisation, while appealing to the authority of objective, apolitical science to bolster their positions. A paradox appears in that the more fervent the appeal to unpoliticised science, the more the politicisation of science is on display. A normative suggestion is offered: the discourses found in these newspapers all involve rhetorical, ideological, authority-seeking, and thoroughly political appeals to science, thus undermining any hope of grounding responses to climate change in science that is free from politics. But they are not all equivalent: some offer a means to sincere and accountable public deliberations involving scientific knowledge, and thus are preferable for addressing climate change.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/35864
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subject.keywordsPublic understanding of science
dc.subject.keywordsPopularization of science--Climate change
dc.subject.keywordsScience communication
dc.subject.keywordsscience and technology studies
dc.subject.keywordsmedia studies
dc.subject.keywordsClimate changes--Skepticism
dc.subject.keywordsPhilosophy of science
dc.titleMediating Public Science: Experts, Politics, and Climate Change in the News Media in Canada
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Isopp_Bernhard_I_2018_PhD.pdf
Size:
3.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.87 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
YorkU_ETDlicense.txt
Size:
3.39 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Science & Technology Studies

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.