Biotech Animals, Ethics, and Care Approaches in Contemporary Science Fiction

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorAllan Weiss
dc.contributor.authorMonica Sousa
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T11:16:16Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T11:16:16Z
dc.date.copyright2024-08-26
dc.date.issued2024-11-07
dc.date.updated2024-11-07T11:16:15Z
dc.degree.disciplineEnglish
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.description.abstractBiotech Animals, Ethics, and Care Approaches in Contemporary Science Fiction contributes to the growing body of works focused on animal studies and science fiction by exploring its connections with biotechnological practices and an animal ethics of care theoretical framework. With a focus on what I choose to call “biotech animals” (which may include animals genetically engineered/modified or animal cyborgs with robotic/cybernetic bodily attachments or enhancements), I explore how contemporary science fiction represents the ethical treatment of these altered animals, particularly after their creation. By tracing out these discussions, I examine how my contemporary focal texts reveal the capacities of the reader/audience to question what caring relations between humans and biotech animals could look like if humans acknowledged both their responsibility and their obligation towards their creations. The analytical chapters of my dissertation examine Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam trilogy (2003-2013), Bong Joon-ho’s Okja (2017), Kirstin’s Bakis’s Lives of the Monster Dogs (1997), Grant Morrison and Frank Quitely’s We3 (2004), Pat Murphy’s “Rachel in Love” (1987), Emma Geen’s The Many Selves of Katherine North (2016), Dean Koontz’s Watchers (1987), and Jeff Vandermeer’s Borne (2017). There are key questions that shape my analysis. What does care look like when applied to biotech animals? How do these texts depict, in various ways, processes that do not suggest a caring framework? In what scenarios are they complicated? Additionally, my dissertation explores the influential role of science fiction in demonstrating that the way we relate to caring relations are often easily affected by biocapitalism and other similar forms of human control. In doing so, my dissertation also draws attention to how these fictional works can draw attention to alternate ways of relating to biotech animals that subvert anthropocentrism while still holding on to core care values, suggesting a need to consider a philosophical posthumanism mindset that removes the human from the center of all ethical consideration.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10315/42497
dc.languageen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectLiterature
dc.subjectEthics
dc.subject.keywordsliterature
dc.subject.keywordsanimal studies
dc.subject.keywordscontemporary literature
dc.subject.keywordsscience fiction
dc.subject.keywordsspeculative fiction
dc.subject.keywordscontemporary fiction
dc.subject.keywordsethics
dc.subject.keywordsethics of care
dc.subject.keywordscare theory
dc.subject.keywordsbiotechnology
dc.subject.keywordsposthumanism
dc.subject.keywordsAtwood
dc.subject.keywordsJeff Vandermeer
dc.subject.keywordsBong Joon-ho
dc.subject.keywordsTransgenesis
dc.subject.keywordsCyborgs
dc.subject.keywordsCyborg animals
dc.titleBiotech Animals, Ethics, and Care Approaches in Contemporary Science Fiction
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sousa_Monica_2024_PhD.pdf
Size:
1.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

ETD SWORD Deposit

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.