Kakuma's Shadows: Everyday Violence in the Lives and Livelihoods of Young People Living at the Turkana-Kakuma Refugee Camp Nexus

This dissertation is an ethnographic case study of how everyday violence impacts the lives of refugee and host community young people living in and around Kakuma refugee camp in Turkana County, northwestern Kenya. By engaging with scholarship on structural violence theory and the social determinants of health, this study demonstrates how structural and political exclusions intersect with age, gender and ethnicity to produce insecurity for both refugee and local host young people, and for young mothers in particular. It also demonstrates the complex forms of exploitation that refugee and host young people experience in their efforts to protect themselves against violence in their everyday lives, and how they use their bodies to mitigate the resource, rights and protection deficits that shape their life worlds. Fourteen months of qualitative fieldwork in Kakuma and its environs revealed that informal labour, intermarriages, practices of relocation and, sometimes, rape itself, have become multidimensional strategies used by both refugees and hosts to overcome the rights and protection deficits they face and to access the basic needs the humanitarian regime and the nation state have failed to provide. I argue that these complex forms of exploitation and coping are forced by a continuum of systemic neglect and entrenched refugee-host co-dependency and co-survival. They also rest outside the purview of normative humanitarian policy and practice at global and national levels; they operate in the background of, and are unconsidered within child protection policies, host inclusion policies, and current institutionalized vulnerability categories. As a result, they are normalized, persist unabated, go beyond mere survival, and are not temporary. Yet, they result in only temporary safety nets. In the long term, these strategies lead to increased discrimination, lowered social capital, a lack of access to supportive resources, and further destitution for both refugees and hosts. I conclude that these are the shadows Kakuma casts. Because the shadows are symptomatic of power and of policy deficits, young refugees and hosts are systematically denied the right to dignity, health, education and well-being, the impacts of which are overlooked with grave consequences to human rights.