Rethinking the Law of Interrogations and Confessions in Canada

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorStribopoulos, James
dc.creatorDavoudi, Fariborz
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-20T16:30:36Z
dc.date.available2016-09-20T16:30:36Z
dc.date.copyright2015-05-25
dc.date.issued2016-09-20
dc.date.updated2016-09-20T16:30:36Z
dc.degree.disciplineLaw
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is a discussion about the inadequacy of the Canadian confessions rule in light of what modern forensic psychology reveals about the human mind, and the propensity of legally-sanctioned interrogation tactics to cause suspects to make false confessions. Contemporary forensic psychology research makes it clear that many of the techniques used in police interviewing and interrogation can have the effect of subverting or overbearing an individuals free-choice and can cause them to make a false confession. Yet many of these same techniques are considered acceptable according to the Canadian law of voluntariness. This thesis examines the confessions rule and examines the key features of an involuntary confession as defined by the Canadian courts. The thesis also compares the structure and content of two different methods of interrogation used by contemporary police: the Reid Technique, and the PEACE model. The thesis will demonstrate the problems associated with each interrogation method, and will show how a suspect can be led into making an involuntary or false confession. The content of this thesis can be broken down into a number of stages.. The first stage takes a historical approach to the development of confessions law in England and shows how the judges of the nineteenth century gave shape to the basic rule for the admissibility of confessions evidence: the voluntariness doctrine. Next, the application of voluntariness in Canada is examined as the English law was adopted in Canadian cases. The concept of voluntariness then expanded on Canadian soil to take on additional features, which are discussed. These different historical developments are evaluated in light of Herbert Packers crime-control and due process models. Following this, there will be a discussion of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms impact on interrogation and confessions, where the protective capability of the section 10(b) right to counsel is explored. In the next stage, this thesis will discuss the privilege against self-incrimination with a focus on the fact that many scholars want to do away with this ancient right and move towards an accused-speaks model.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/32128
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subject.keywordsPolice interrogations
dc.subject.keywordsFalse confessions
dc.subject.keywordsReid techniques
dc.subject.keywordsRight against self-incrimination
dc.subject.keywordsPEACE
dc.subject.keywordsWrongful convictions
dc.subject.keywordsThe Charter
dc.subject.keywordsVoluntariness
dc.titleRethinking the Law of Interrogations and Confessions in Canada
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Davoudi_Fariborz_2015_PhD.pdf
Size:
18.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
YorkU_ETDlicense.txt
Size:
3.38 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Law

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.