A Critical Approach to the Regulation of a Public Corporation's Purchase of Its Own Shares on the Open Market: Lessons from The Transatlantic Comparison

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorWilliams, Cynthia A.
dc.contributor.authorCohaz, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-14T16:19:55Z
dc.date.available2022-12-14T16:19:55Z
dc.date.copyright2022-02-10
dc.date.issued2022-12-14
dc.date.updated2022-12-14T16:19:55Z
dc.degree.disciplineLaw
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.description.abstractOpen market repurchases (OMRs)—by far the most common form of share repurchases—have reached record levels following the dramatic increase in number since the adoption of the safe harbor rule in the US. This dramatic increase has been largely attributed to purported benefits of OMRs that matter especially within the Anglo-American economic and corporate model. However, these benefits fail to fully explain such increase. This failure suggests that illegitimate purposes, which could easily be concealed beneath purported benefits, might have also contributed to the increase in the number of OMRs and resulted in their excessive use. This suggestion is supported by the ineffectiveness of the safe harbor rule applicable to OMRs in the US that paves the way for the exploitation of OMRs by corporate actors having inside or superior information. On the other hand, any and all share repurchases used to be strictly regulated in the EU. However, some EU Member States and later the EU itself relaxed legal capital rules including the rule on share repurchases and adopted a safe harbor rule on OMRs that is essentially similar to that in the US. This substantial legal convergence has also been followed by an increase in the number of OMRs in the EU. Notwithstanding that the increase in the EU has been more rapid than that in the US, the number of OMRs in the EU has been much lower than in the US. The less frequent use of OMRs supports the claim that corporations substantially persist in the Continental European model. In this model, the purported benefits of OMRs have been less significant and the potential of abuse of OMRs have been less probable than in the US. Such persistence has also been partly reflected on the OMR regulation in the EU that prescribes a less ineffective framework than that in the US through a few but crucial regulatory technical differences. Hence, this dissertation compares and contrasts rules and practices relating to OMRs on both sides of the Atlantic and comes up with a series of regulatory proposals to maintain the purported benefits while curbing the number and eliminating the potential drawbacks arising from the abuse of OMRs, particularly in the US but also in the EU and elsewhere. These proposals include two main easy-to-implement regulatory policy proposals, namely the enhancement of current disclosure requirements and the increase of oversight mechanism on OMRs, and a number of complementary proposals that include recommendations for various market actors to reduce the excessive use of OMRs.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/40610
dc.languageen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectFinance
dc.subjectEconomics
dc.subject.keywordsOpen market repurchases
dc.subject.keywordsStock buybacks
dc.subject.keywordsStock dividends
dc.subject.keywordsExecutive stock options
dc.subject.keywordsHostile takeovers
dc.subject.keywordsStock dilution
dc.subject.keywordsRule 10b-18
dc.subject.keywordsRule 10b5-1
dc.subject.keywordsInsider trading plans
dc.subject.keywordsMarket manipulation
dc.subject.keywordsDirect insider trading
dc.subject.keywordsIndirect insider trading
dc.subject.keywordsActive share ownership
dc.subject.keywordsShareholder activism
dc.subject.keywordsShort-termism
dc.subject.keywordsRepurchase disclosure regime
dc.subject.keywordsDividend-protected stock options
dc.subject.keywordsUS Securities and Exchange Commission
dc.subject.keywordsEuropean Securities Market Authority
dc.subject.keywordsEU Market Abuse Directive
dc.subject.keywordsEU Market Abuse Regulation
dc.subject.keywordsEC Commission Delegated Regulation
dc.subject.keywordsEU Market Law
dc.subject.keywordsComparative corporate law
dc.subject.keywordsConvergence and divergence
dc.subject.keywordsSecurities Regulation
dc.subject.keywordsSecurities Law
dc.subject.keywordsInsider trading rules
dc.subject.keywordsLiberal market economies
dc.subject.keywordsCoordinated market economies
dc.subject.keywordsComparative law and finance
dc.subject.keywordsLaw and economics
dc.titleA Critical Approach to the Regulation of a Public Corporation's Purchase of Its Own Shares on the Open Market: Lessons from The Transatlantic Comparison
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cohaz_Alper_2022_PhD.pdf
Size:
1.84 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.87 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
YorkU_ETDlicense.txt
Size:
3.39 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Law

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.