YorkSpace has migrated to a new version of its software. Access our Help Resources to learn how to use the refreshed site. Contact diginit@yorku.ca if you have any questions about the migration.
 

Validation of the Physician Attitudes toward Cardiac Rehabilitation & Referral (PACRR) Scale

dc.contributor.authorLima de Melo Ghisi, Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorGrace, Sherry
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-19T16:44:23Z
dc.date.available2021-04-19T16:44:23Z
dc.date.issued2019-08
dc.description.abstractBackground: One of the key drivers of cardiac rehabilitation under-utilization is physician referral failure. The Physician Attitudes toward Cardiac Rehabilitation & Referral (PACRR) scale was developed to understand factors that impact their referral practices, so they can be ultimately reliably be identified and mitigated. The objectives of this study were to assess the reliability, factor structure, and validity of the PACRR. Methods: Data were retrospectively analyzed from 3 cohorts administering the PACRR, a 19-item scale. The first cohort consisted of 185 cardiologists or family physicians; the second of 51 of the same, and the third of 97 cardiologists. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha, factor structure by confirmatory factor analysis, construct validity by significant differences in PACRR scores by physician specialty, and criterion validity by testing for significant differences in PACRR scores by referral. Results: Cronbach’s alpha was 0.81, 0.71, and 0.69 in each of the 3 cohorts, respectively. Factor analysis in the latter 2 cohorts revealed 4 factors: referral norms, preference to manage patients independently of CR, perceptions of program quality, and referral processes. Construct validity was established in the first cohort, as significant differences in PACRR scores were found by physician specialty. Criterion validity was supported by significant differences in mean scores by referral in each cohort. Physicians rated bad experiences with CR programs, poor program quality, skepticism of CR benefits and lack of familiarity with local programs as the most important factors that affected their referral to CR. Conclusions: In conclusion, the PACRR scale was demonstrated to have good reliability and validity. Physician Attitudes toward Cardiac Rehabilitation & Referral.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHeart, Lung and Circulation, Volume 28, Issue 8, August 2019, Pages 1218-1224.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1443-9506
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2018.07.001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/38289
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsElsevier Journals © <2019>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.articlehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1443950618318225en_US
dc.rights.journalhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/heart-lung-and-circulationen_US
dc.rights.publisherhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectphysicians' practice patternsen_US
dc.subjecthealth knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectattitudesen_US
dc.subjectpracticeen_US
dc.subjectquestionnairesen_US
dc.subjectcardiac rehabilitationen_US
dc.titleValidation of the Physician Attitudes toward Cardiac Rehabilitation & Referral (PACRR) Scaleen_US
dc.title.alternativePhysician Attitudes toward Cardiac Rehabilitation & Referralen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AAM.10.1016.j.hlc.2018.07.001.pdf
Size:
1.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: