Cardiac Rehabilitation Costs

dc.contributor.authorMoghei, Mahshid
dc.contributor.authorTurk-Adawi, Karam
dc.contributor.authorIsaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
dc.contributor.authorSarrafzadegan, Nizal
dc.contributor.authorOh, Paul
dc.contributor.authorChessex, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorGrace, Sherry
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-25T21:30:34Z
dc.date.available2021-01-25T21:30:34Z
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite the clinical benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and its cost-effectiveness, it is not widely received. Arguably, capacity could be greatly increased if lower-cost models were implemented. The aims of this review were to describe: the costs associated with CR delivery, approaches to reduce these costs, and associated implications. Methods: Upon finalizing the PICO statement, information scientists were enlisted to develop the search strategy of MEDLINE, Embase, CDSR, Google Scholar and Scopus. Citations identified were considered for inclusion by the first author. Extracted cost data were summarized in tabular format and qualitatively synthesized. Results: There is wide variability in the cost of CR delivery around the world, and patients pay out-of-pocket for some or all of services in 55% of countries. Supervised CR costs in high-income countries ranged from PPP$294 (Purchasing Power Parity; 2016 United States Dollars) in the United Kingdom to PPP$12,409 in Italy, and in middle-income countries ranged from PPP$146 in Venezuela to PPP$1095 in Brazil. Costs relate to facilities, personnel, and session dose. Delivering CR using information and communication technology(mean cost PPP$753/patient/program), lowering the dose and using lower-cost personnel and equipment are important strategies to consider in containing costs, however few explicitly low-cost models are available in the literature. Conclusion: More research is needed regarding the costs to deliver CR in community settings, the cost-effectiveness of CR in most countries, and the economic impact of return-to-work with CR participation. A low-cost model of CR should be standardized and tested for efficacy across multiple healthcare systems.en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Cardiology Volume 244, 1 October 2017, Pages 322-328en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-5273
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.030en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/38068
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsElsevier Journals © <2017>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.articlehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167527317332291en_US
dc.rights.journalhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/en_US
dc.rights.publisherhttps://www.elsevier.com/en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectcardiac rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectcardiovascular diseasesen_US
dc.subjectcosten_US
dc.subjectdeveloping countriesen_US
dc.subjecteconomicsen_US
dc.titleCardiac Rehabilitation Costsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10.1016.j.ijcard.2017.06.030.pdf
Size:
244.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: