YorkSpace has migrated to a new version of its software. Access our Help Resources to learn how to use the refreshed site. Contact diginit@yorku.ca if you have any questions about the migration.
 

The Paradox of Refugee Protection in Canada: Law and Bureaucratic Politics of Efficiency

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorGosine, Andil
dc.contributor.authorMasoumi, Azar
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-11T12:36:31Z
dc.date.available2020-05-11T12:36:31Z
dc.date.copyright2019-08
dc.date.issued2020-05-11
dc.date.updated2020-05-11T12:36:31Z
dc.degree.disciplineSociology
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.description.abstractOver the course of the past few decades, access to refugee rights has been both expanded and restricted across the liberal democratic world. On the one hand, groups that previously had no ground for protection, such as domestically-abused women and sexual minorities, are now commonly considered legitimate refugees by liberal states. On the other hand, access to refugee systems and rights in the liberal world has become increasingly more restricted. This dissertation takes Canada as the site of its study to examine the paradoxical developments in access to refugee protection in the past thirty years. I draw on archival, interview, media and organizational data to argue that the Canadian refugee protection regime is a dynamic, complex and conflictual articulation of an expansionist and humanitarian impetus as well as a pragmatic and restrictionist compulsion. I suggest that these contradictory impulses are symptomatic of the paradoxical project of state-controlled refugee protection: the paradox of ensuring universal equality of rights through the exclusionary mechanisms of the nation-state. I further argue that the Canadian regime of refugee protection remains relatively stable despite its internal contradictions, by placing its conflictual impulses in systematic and structural arrangements. First, while expansions are primarily, although not exclusively, achieved in the field of legislation and jurisprudence, restrictions are, in large part, accomplished in administrative and bureaucratic fields. Second, while expansions in refugee rights emerge around tightly bounded categories of Convention refugees, gender-based claimants, and sexual orientation and gender identity refugees, restrictions concern ever-shifting, institutionally manufactured, and often nationally demarcated groups of excludable claimants. I suggest that these articulated arrangements maintain state-controlled refugee protection in place despite its internal paradoxes and keep refugee protection a promise that is never fully fulfilled.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10315/37351
dc.languageen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectSociology
dc.subject.keywordsRefugee protection
dc.subject.keywordsState-controlled migration regulation
dc.subject.keywordsRefugee law
dc.subject.keywordsBureaucracy
dc.subject.keywordsRefugee and immigration bureaucracy
dc.subject.keywordsCanada
dc.subject.keywordsGender-based refugee protection
dc.subject.keywordsSexual orientation and gender identity refugee protection
dc.subject.keywordsNeoliberal governance
dc.titleThe Paradox of Refugee Protection in Canada: Law and Bureaucratic Politics of Efficiency
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation

Files

Collections

Sociology

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.