Protection of Refugees in the Non-Signatory States to the 1951 Refugee Convention: Bangladesh Case Study
dc.contributor.author | Haque, Muhammad Ekramul | |
dc.contributor.author | Siddique, Md. Abu Bakar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-27T20:18:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-27T20:18:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-12 | |
dc.description | This book chapter is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND license and is available at https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004718128_003. | |
dc.description.abstract | The elements of refugee protection, whether in signatory or non-signatory states, indicate a holistic framework to ensure efficient and effective functioning of refugee governance across multiple levels of institutions, sectors, and actors. Protecting the most persecuted refugee communities in the world involves adopting fair, clear, and implementable laws that adhere to the principle of equality and non-discrimination, accountability to the law, legal certainty, avoidance of arbitrariness, and procedural and legal transparency. The best practices in refugee protection integrate critical refugee needs with essential human rights elements, providing a basis for enhanced constitutionalism within diverse geographical settings. This article sheds light on both the institutional and legal structures of Bangladesh, concluding that, among other factors, refugees in non-signatory states to the 1951 Refugee Convention can find hope in the steady and progressive constitutionalism achievable through judicial interpretations to close the protection gap and fulfill respective Customary International Law (CIL) obligations, despite Bangladesh’s non-recognition of Rohingya as “refugees,” since this poses a significant road block to any sort of “steady and progressive constitutionalism” or “judicial interpretations.” | |
dc.identifier.citation | Haque, M. E., & Siddique, M. A. B. (2024). "Protection of Refugees in the Non-Signatory States to the 1951 Refugee Convention: Bangladesh Case Study". In Asian Yearbook of International Law. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004718128_003 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-90-04-71812-8 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-90-04-71811-1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10315/42694 | |
dc.publisher | Brill/Nijhoff | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Refugee protection | |
dc.subject | Rohingya refugees | |
dc.subject | Bangladesh | |
dc.subject | Non-signatory states | |
dc.subject | 1951 Refugee Convention | |
dc.title | Protection of Refugees in the Non-Signatory States to the 1951 Refugee Convention: Bangladesh Case Study | |
dc.type | Book Chapter |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Siddique_2024_Protection of Refugees in the Non-Signatory States to the 1951 Refugee Convention: Bangladesh Case Study.pdf
- Size:
- 335.58 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.83 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: