Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale

dc.contributor.authorShanmugasegaram, Shamila
dc.contributor.authorGagliese, Lucia
dc.contributor.authorOh, P.
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Donna Eileen
dc.contributor.authorBrister, Stephanie J.
dc.contributor.authorChan, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorGrace, Sherry
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-13T21:48:32Z
dc.date.available2025-02-13T21:48:32Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.descriptionThis article was published under a CC-BY-NC Creative Commons licence.
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS). Design, setting, and participants: In total, 2636 cardiac inpatients from 11 hospitals completed a survey. One year later, participants completed a follow-up survey, which included the CRBS. A subsample of patients also completed a third survey which included the CRBS, the Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scale, and the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation scale three weeks later. The CRBS asked participants to rate 21 cardiac rehabilitation barriers on a five-point Likert scale regardless of cardiac rehabilitation referral or enrolment. Results: Maximum likelihood factor analysis with oblique rotation resulted in a four-factor solution: perceived need/healthcare factors (eigenvalue = 6.13, Cronbach’s α = .89), logistical factors (eigenvalue = 5.83, Cronbach’s α = .88), work/time conflicts (eigenvalue = 3.78, Cronbach’s α = .71), and comorbidities/functional status (eigenvalue = 4.85, Cronbach’s α = .83). Mean total perceived barriers were significantly greater among non-enrollees than cardiac rehabilitation enrollees (P < .001). Convergent validity with the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scales was also demonstrated. Test-retest reliability of the CRBS was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient = .64). Conclusion: The CRBS consists of four subscales and has sound psychometric properties. The extent to which identified barriers can be addressed to facilitate greater cardiac rehabilitation utilization warrants future study.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by an Interdisciplinary Capacity Enhancement Grant funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada [grant number HOA-80676]. In addition, the former funder provided personnel support to Dr. Grace [award number MSH-80489] and Ms. Shanmugasegaram.
dc.identifier.citationShanmugasegaram, S., Gagliese, L., Oh, P., Stewart, D. E., Brister, S. J., Chan, V., & Grace, S. L. (2011). Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale. Clinical Rehabilitation, 26(2), 152-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511410579
dc.identifier.issn0269-2155
dc.identifier.issn1477-0873
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511410579
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10315/42633
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Journals
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectBarriers to rehabilitation
dc.subjectCardiac rehabilitation
dc.subjectFactor analysis
dc.subjectMeasurement instrument
dc.subjectPsychometry
dc.titlePsychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Grace_2011_Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale.pdf
Size:
223.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: