Cardiologists' charting varied by risk factor, and was often discordant with patient report

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2008-10

Authors

Grace, Sherry L.
Alter, David
Higginson, Lyall
Suskin, Neville
Stewart, Donna Eileen
Gravely-Witte, Shannon

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam

Abstract

Objective: To assess the completeness of cardiac risk factor documentation by cardiologists, and agreement with patient report. Study Design and Setting: A total of 68 Ontario cardiologists and 789 of their ambulatory cardiology patients were randomly selected. Cardiac risk factor data were systematically extracted from medical charts, and a survey was mailed to participants to assess risk factor concordance. Results: With regard to completeness of risk factor documentation, 90.4% of charts contained a report of hypertension, 87.2% of diabetes, 80.5% of dyslipidemia, 78.6% of smoking behavior, 73.0% of other comorbidities, 48.7% of family history of heart disease, and 45.9% of body mass index or obesity. Using Cohen's K, there was a concordance of 87.7% between physician charts and patient self-report of diabetes, 69.5% for obesity, 56.8% for smoking status, 49% for hypertension, and 48.4% for family history. Conclusion: Two of four major cardiac risk factors (hypertension and diabetes) were recorded in 90% of patient records; however, arguably the most important reversible risk factors for cardiac disease (dyslipidemia and smoking) were only reported 80% of the time. The results suggest that physician chart report may not be the criterion standard for quality assessment in cardiac risk factor reporting.

Description

Keywords

Risk factors, Cardiologist, Concordance, Completeness, Patient self-report, Medical charts

Citation

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(10), 1073-1079. October 2008