Thinking the End in Itself: a Critical Study of First Principles in Plato, Aristotle, the Bible, and Kant

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorPolka, Brayton
dc.creatorKhimji, Mohamed
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-17T14:53:14Z
dc.date.available2014-07-17T14:53:14Z
dc.date.copyright2014-04-21
dc.date.issued2014-07-09
dc.date.updated2014-07-09T17:08:46Z
dc.degree.disciplineSocial & Political Thought
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.description.abstractWhat is truth? What is untruth? Or is there no truth or untruth? Is the mind trapped, as Hume concludes, between false reason and no reason? In my dissertation I show that Hume’s conclusion is inevitable only when we reduce moral reason, founded on the biblical ideal of love, to the law of contradiction and sense perception, the twin engines of ancient Greek teleology. To defend the above, I argue that there is no consciousness of either truth or untruth in ancient Greek thought. That is why its two greatest expositors, Plato and Aristotle, teach that human beings are ignorant of the end in itself, the highest good (or telos) that all men seek. For the end is, in itself, not relative (related) to consciousness which is not (the) good but to appearance only. The ancient Greeks, I show, have no alternative but to employ deductive logic and inductive logic as the indemonstrable bases of demonstration. This leads them into inescapable contradictions. Kant demonstrates that sense perception and logic are each worthless unless they serve moral ends. This insight, he shows, is biblical. “Christianity” reveals that the truth cannot be thought except as existing and cannot exist except in thought. For the “categorical imperative” to love your neighbor (the stranger, your friend, your enemy …) as yourself by treating her as you would want her to treat you, i.e., always as an end and never as a means, is a priori. This means, Kant sees, that there is no possibility even of thinking of anything that is absolutely good, in the world or out of it, except a good will. In the dissertation that follows I distinguish between two incommensurable ontologies: the ancient Greek, in which human beings are ignorant of the end in itself, and the biblical, in which the moral will is the end in itself. I show that to conflate these standpoints is to conflate reason with logic and sense, bad will (evil) with ignorance, and, in so doing, to create the contradictions that necessarily follow whenever we seek the truth in things that we cannot will.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/27672
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectPhilosophy of Religionen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.subjectReligionen_US
dc.subject.keywordsValuesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsAncient Greeksen_US
dc.subject.keywordsAristotleen_US
dc.subject.keywordsBibleen_US
dc.subject.keywordsCategorical imperativeen_US
dc.subject.keywordsCompareen_US
dc.subject.keywordsContrasten_US
dc.subject.keywordsChristianityen_US
dc.subject.keywordsDifferenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordsEnd in itselfen_US
dc.subject.keywordsEthicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsExistenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordsFirst principlesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsGoden_US
dc.subject.keywordsHermeneuticsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsHuman beingsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsInterpretationen_US
dc.subject.keywordsJudaismen_US
dc.subject.keywordsKanten_US
dc.subject.keywordsMetaphysicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsMoralityen_US
dc.subject.keywordsNew Testamenten_US
dc.subject.keywordsOld Testamenten_US
dc.subject.keywordsOntologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsPhilosophyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsPlatoen_US
dc.subject.keywordsRelationshipen_US
dc.subject.keywordsReligionen_US
dc.subject.keywordsTeleologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsTelosen_US
dc.subject.keywordsThinkingen_US
dc.subject.keywordsTranscendentalen_US
dc.subject.keywordsTruthen_US
dc.titleThinking the End in Itself: a Critical Study of First Principles in Plato, Aristotle, the Bible, and Kanten_US
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Khimji_Mohamed_2014_PhD.pdf
Size:
1.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
YorkU_ETDlicense.txt
Size:
3.38 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Social & Political Thought

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.