A Theoretically-Informed Approach to Reflective Teaching Practices in an Online EAP Context: A Mixed Methods Action Research Study
dc.contributor.advisor | Lawrence, Geoff | |
dc.contributor.author | Johnston, Kris Pierre | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-04T15:21:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-04T15:21:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-08-04 | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-08-04T15:21:30Z | |
dc.degree.discipline | Linguistics and Applied Linguistics (Applied Linguistics) | |
dc.degree.level | Doctoral | |
dc.degree.name | PhD - Doctor of Philosophy | |
dc.description.abstract | The sudden transition to online instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic presented novel challenges for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instructors employing collaborative pedagogies to provide important scaffolding to support academic writing instruction. Using a facilitating framework, such as the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework, a model of online learning, can assist EAP instructors in course development by supporting EAP instructors' reflective teaching practices. The CoI informs decision-making when designing collaborative writing tasks and pedagogical approaches by providing useful heuristics that measure student learning experiences. This study explores an instructor's experience in implementing a Mixed Methods Action Research approach to reflective practice using the CoI framework and survey instrument to guide course development and collaborative writing task design in a year-long online EAP course. This study aims to understand to what extent the CoI supports reflective practice and to examine pedagogical issues that emerge that inform the use of the CoI for these purposes. Findings reveal that the CoI framework effectively guides reflective teaching practices and fosters meaningful learning experiences by breaking down the three constructs into actionable items, facilitating interactivity, discussion, and collaboration, and providing scaffolding for learners. However, findings also emphasize the need to use the CoI framework with caution and to develop a deeper understanding of pedagogical theory and practice to better address challenges in collaborative writing tasks. Overall, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of effective EAP pedagogy in online settings and has the potential to inform the design and delivery of future online EAP courses using the CoI as a facilitating framework. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10315/41392 | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.rights | Author owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests. | |
dc.subject | Curriculum development | |
dc.subject | English as a second language | |
dc.subject | Higher education | |
dc.subject.keywords | Online instruction | |
dc.subject.keywords | COVID-19 pandemic | |
dc.subject.keywords | English for Academic Purposes (EAP) | |
dc.subject.keywords | Collaborative pedagogies | |
dc.subject.keywords | Academic writing instruction | |
dc.subject.keywords | Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework | |
dc.subject.keywords | Online learning model | |
dc.subject.keywords | Reflective teaching practices | |
dc.subject.keywords | Course development | |
dc.subject.keywords | Collaborative writing tasks | |
dc.subject.keywords | Pedagogical approaches | |
dc.subject.keywords | Student learning experiences | |
dc.subject.keywords | Mixed methods action research | |
dc.subject.keywords | Survey instrument | |
dc.subject.keywords | Interactivity | |
dc.subject.keywords | Discussion | |
dc.subject.keywords | Collaboration | |
dc.subject.keywords | Scaffolding | |
dc.subject.keywords | Pedagogical theory | |
dc.subject.keywords | Effective EAP pedagogy | |
dc.subject.keywords | Online EAP courses | |
dc.subject.keywords | Facilitating framework | |
dc.title | A Theoretically-Informed Approach to Reflective Teaching Practices in an Online EAP Context: A Mixed Methods Action Research Study | |
dc.type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Johnston_Kris_P_2023_Phd.pdf
- Size:
- 1.54 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format