Epistemological Justice in Strategic Challenges to Legislation under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorBerger, Benjamin L.
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Dana Erin
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T17:29:31Z
dc.date.available2021-03-08T17:29:31Z
dc.date.copyright2021-01
dc.date.issued2021-03-08
dc.date.updated2021-03-08T17:29:31Z
dc.degree.disciplineLaw
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation responds to two recent developments in the landscape of Canadian constitutional litigation. First, the advent of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has invited a wave of strategic constitutional challenges directed at systemic social reform, including many cases aligned with progressive social justice goals. Second, the focus of Charter litigation has shifted from legal interpretation and argument to the consideration of extensive evidence pertaining to social and legislative facts. The recent successes of a number of strategic Charter challenges to legislation brought on behalf of marginalized communities and involving voluminous evidentiary records suggests that the above developments hold considerable promise for progressive social movements. And yet, critical scholars and activists have persistently questioned the potential of constitutional litigation, and law generally, to effect progressive social change, pointing to a tension between the pursuit of positive legal outcomes and the broader transformation of social power relations. Using a case study of Bedford v Canada (AG), along with interviews of constitutional litigators and judges, this project explores an under-theorized facet of the above-noted tension by asking about the epistemological implications of the wide-ranging fact-finding processes that have come to characterize progressive constitutional challenges to legislation, especially under section 7 of the Charter. This inquiry is premised on the contention that the realization of social justice depends, at least in part, on the realization of what I call "epistemological justice", defined as the just treatment of knowledge in legal processes. Drawing on the work of feminist epistemologists and other critical thinkers, the account of epistemological justice that I develop in this project centers on a commitment to fully hearing and giving due weight to the experiential knowledge of marginalized people who are directly affected by a given law or policy in decision-making processes. My analysis then asks whether the progressive promise of strategic Charter litigation is borne out at the level of epistemological justice in this sense. Ultimately, my findings suggest that there is reason to doubt this proposition, and thus further reason to doubt the value of strategic Charter litigation as a tool for social justice.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/38237
dc.languageen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectGender studies
dc.subject.keywordsCanadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
dc.subject.keywordsstrategic Charter litigation
dc.subject.keywordspublic interest litigation
dc.subject.keywordslaw and social change
dc.subject.keywordssocial justice
dc.subject.keywordsmarginalized groups
dc.subject.keywordsevidence
dc.subject.keywordsNew Evidence Scholarship
dc.subject.keywordsconstitutional fact-finding
dc.subject.keywordssocial and legislative facts
dc.subject.keywordssocial science evidence
dc.subject.keywordsexpert evidence
dc.subject.keywordsexperiential evidence
dc.subject.keywordscommon sense
dc.subject.keywordsfeminist theory
dc.subject.keywordsfeminist epistemology
dc.subject.keywordsepistemological justice
dc.subject.keywordsexperiential knowledge
dc.subject.keywordsScience and Technology Studies
dc.titleEpistemological Justice in Strategic Challenges to Legislation under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Phillips_Dana_E_2021_PhD.pdf
Size:
2.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.87 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
YorkU_ETDlicense.txt
Size:
3.39 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Law

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.