A Comparative Study of Patent Infringement Remedies Related to Non-Practicing Entities in the Courts of Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorMgbeoji, Ikechi M. C.
dc.creatorNikolic, Aleksandar
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-15T19:54:13Z
dc.date.available2014-07-15T19:54:13Z
dc.date.copyright2014-02-06
dc.date.issued2014-07-09
dc.date.updated2014-07-09T16:44:37Z
dc.degree.disciplineLaw
dc.degree.levelMaster's
dc.degree.nameLLM - Master of Laws
dc.description.abstractThis work examines the scope of non-practicing entity behavior and whether the debate on remedies can lead to changes that encourage the goals behind a patent system. Innovation is often the stated goal but the significance of innovation commercialization is often ignored. Furthermore, there has been an increase in business models that involve alternate means of monetizing patents, not all of which were contemplated in the purpose of the patent system. Using the goals of the patent system as a backdrop, this work provides an overview of the impact of remedies available to courts in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States on patent systems. The courts have the tools in each jurisdiction to grant remedies appropriate to the infringement. However, systemic limitations in each patent system often prevent the courts from reviewing disputes.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/27644
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectPatent lawen_US
dc.subjectIntellectual propertyen_US
dc.subjectEconomicsen_US
dc.subjectCommerce-Businessen_US
dc.subject.keywordsLiability remediesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsPatenten_US
dc.subject.keywordsIntellectual propertyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsRemediesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsPropertyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsLiabilityen_US
dc.subject.keywordsEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsCommerceen_US
dc.subject.keywordsCommercializationen_US
dc.subject.keywordsTrollsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsPatent trollsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsNon-practicing entitiesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsPracticing entitiesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsCanadian patent lawen_US
dc.subject.keywordsUnited States patent lawen_US
dc.subject.keywordsU.S. patent lawen_US
dc.subject.keywordsUnited Kingdom patent lawen_US
dc.subject.keywordsU.K. patent lawen_US
dc.subject.keywordsAccounting for profitsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsAccounting of profitsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsDisgorgementen_US
dc.subject.keywordsLost profitsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsRoyaltyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsReasonable royaltyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsProperty rulesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsLiability rulesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsAccess to justiceen_US
dc.subject.keywordsInnovationen_US
dc.subject.keywordsInventionen_US
dc.subject.keywordsProperty remediesen_US
dc.titleA Comparative Study of Patent Infringement Remedies Related to Non-Practicing Entities in the Courts of Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United Statesen_US
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
NIKOLIC_ALEKSANDAR_2014_Masters.pdf
Size:
1.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
YorkU_ETDlicense.txt
Size:
3.38 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Law

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.