Speech, Law and Civil Society: Liberal Thought Against Democratic Politics

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorMaley, Terry
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Grant Taylor
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-04T15:05:15Z
dc.date.available2023-08-04T15:05:15Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-04
dc.date.updated2023-08-04T15:05:14Z
dc.degree.disciplinePolitical Science
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.description.abstractHistorically-informed reflection on democracy reminds us of a curious fact: representative government, supposedly the modern form of democracy, was not originally envisioned as a technical solution to the difficulty of assembling the citizen body of an extensive nation state, but rather as a qualitatively different political form. The first thinkers to dedicate their attention to representative government in a systematic way were perfectly candid in contrasting this type of regime with democracy, which they viewed as an archaic form of politics that was at worst anarchic and at best inappropriate to modern conditions. Much of twentieth century democratic theory has been staged as a dispute between the advocates of a normative model of participatory democracy and an empiricist research program that takes the identification of democracy with representative institutions for granted. This project does not attempt to relitigate this dispute, but rather to widen its stakes. Political representation is only one facet of the modern anti-democratic project. The fact that modern democratic institutions are composed of anti-democratic political forms raises a more extensive set of problems than an exclusive focus on representation would permit us to see. Behind the debate concerning participatory and representative democracy lies an older and more extensive field of conflict: the dispute between liberalism and democracy. Whether one considers the norm of popular sovereignty, the use of elections, or the practice of parliamentary government by discussion, a cursory historical investigation reveals that the political forms which today are considered inseparable from democracy originate in a struggle waged by hereditary aristocracies against monarchical power, or a struggle waged by the “natural aristocracy” of civil society against democracy itself. The following study has two stages. The first is a history of liberal thought written with an emphasis on this tradition’s responses to the threat of democracy. This history is divided into three moments, each of which outlines a distinct family of political reflection: juridical liberalism, empiricist liberalism, and parliamentarism. The second stage is an attempt to identify the contribution of each family of liberal reflection to the modern understanding of democracy. In the final chapters, this is extended to contemporary democratic theory, which is correctly understood as the inheritor of liberal, not democratic, political forms, and which renews many aspects of the liberal tradition’s critique of democracy despite its avowed acceptance of democracy.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10315/41294
dc.languageen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectPolitical Science
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.subjectHistory
dc.subject.keywordsDemocracy
dc.subject.keywordsLiberalism
dc.subject.keywordsHistory of political thought
dc.subject.keywordsDemocratic theory
dc.subject.keywordsPolitical theory
dc.subject.keywordsSocial contract
dc.subject.keywordsNatural law
dc.subject.keywordsSovereignty
dc.subject.keywordsPolitical economy
dc.subject.keywordsSociological liberalism
dc.subject.keywordsParliamentarism
dc.subject.keywordsPublic reason
dc.subject.keywordsPublic sphere
dc.subject.keywordsHobbes
dc.subject.keywordsRousseau
dc.subject.keywordsSieyes
dc.subject.keywordsGuizot
dc.subject.keywordsSchumpeter
dc.subject.keywordsSchmitt
dc.subject.keywordsHabermas
dc.titleSpeech, Law and Civil Society: Liberal Thought Against Democratic Politics
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Andersen_Grant_T_2023_PhD.pdf
Size:
1.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.87 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
YorkU_ETDlicense.txt
Size:
3.39 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Political Science

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.