Optimal Automated Vehicle Piloting: Avoiding Perfection being the Enemy of the Good
dc.contributor.advisor | Nourinejad, Mehdi | |
dc.contributor.author | Dhaness, Joshua Devindra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-10T10:46:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-10T10:46:26Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-09-10 | |
dc.date.issued | 2025-04-10 | |
dc.date.updated | 2025-04-10T10:46:26Z | |
dc.degree.discipline | Civil Engineering | |
dc.degree.level | Master's | |
dc.degree.name | MASc - Master of Applied Science | |
dc.description.abstract | Optimal timing for automated vehicle (AV) pilot programs is essential to balance early implementation benefits against the goal of perfected safety. Although AV technology is not accident-free, it shows potential in reducing crash rates. This work introduces a mathematical framework designed to maximize social welfare through AV pilots, integrating elements such as safety metrics, technology diffusion, and learning effects. The framework’s three models address scenarios that social planners may encounter, offering flexibility in balancing initial risks with anticipated safety improvements over time. A case study illustrates these models, emphasizing the framework’s utility in navigating trade-offs like managing higher early failure rates while leveraging learning-based enhancements. By adjusting input parameters, planners can customize pilot designs to meet community needs. Future improvements, such as variable weighting and iterative testing, are proposed to enhance the framework’s adaptability and its capacity to capture critical AV deployment considerations. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10315/42784 | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.rights | Author owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests. | |
dc.subject.keywords | Automated vehicles | |
dc.subject.keywords | AV | |
dc.subject.keywords | AVs | |
dc.subject.keywords | Autonomous vehicles | |
dc.subject.keywords | AV safety | |
dc.subject.keywords | Transportation planning | |
dc.subject.keywords | Pilot deployment | |
dc.subject.keywords | Social welfare optimization | |
dc.subject.keywords | Diffusion models | |
dc.subject.keywords | Learning effects | |
dc.subject.keywords | Disengagement rates | |
dc.subject.keywords | Social costs | |
dc.subject.keywords | Public transit integration | |
dc.subject.keywords | Risk minimization | |
dc.subject.keywords | Technological advancement | |
dc.subject.keywords | AV pilot framework | |
dc.subject.keywords | Social planner decision-making | |
dc.subject.keywords | AV case study | |
dc.subject.keywords | Safety improvements | |
dc.subject.keywords | Trade-offs in AV deployment | |
dc.subject.keywords | Model customization | |
dc.subject.keywords | AV adoption | |
dc.subject.keywords | Diffusion | |
dc.subject.keywords | AV pilot design | |
dc.title | Optimal Automated Vehicle Piloting: Avoiding Perfection being the Enemy of the Good | |
dc.type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Joshua_Devindra_Dhaness_2024_MASc.pdf
- Size:
- 3.18 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format