Perceptions of cardiac rehabilitation patients, specialists and rehabilitation programs regarding cardiac rehabilitation wait times

BACKGROUND: Access to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remains at approximately 30%, despite a national target of 70%. This study evaluated cardiac specialist and CR program perceptions of CR access and referral strategies. METHODS: Postal and online surveys of Canadian CR specialists and CR programs were administered. Responses were received from 71 of 765 CR specialists (9.3%) and 92 of 149 CR programs (61.7%). Respondents rated perceptions on 5-point Likert scales. RESULTS: Specialists rated patient access to CR as moderate (2.9 ± 1.4). While they reported that they refer 65.9% of their patients, they most frequently do not refer because their patients report disinterest (23.4%) or geographic barriers to access (23.4%). Cardiac rehabilitation programs reported having capacity to serve a median of 275 patients annually, yet reportedly serving up to 350. The most commonly used methods of referral included discharge order sets (over 60%) and allied health care provider support. Electronic referral was perceived to be highly effective (4.1 ± 1.0) yet the least frequently used. Cardiac rehabilitation programs perceived more patients are accessing CR because of these referral strategies, but increased patients strain program resources. CONCLUSIONS: Some of the least frequently used referral strategies were perceived as, and are also empirically demonstrated to be, most effective. Broader implementation of these strategies, while better-resourcing CR programs, may improve the continuum of care for cardiac patients.