YorkSpace has migrated to a new version of its software. Access our Help Resources to learn how to use the refreshed site. Contact diginit@yorku.ca if you have any questions about the migration.
 

Planning Healthy Cities: Privately-owned publicly-accessible spaces in Toronto

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2019

Authors

Nievas, Mallory

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Privately-owned publicly-accessible spaces (POPS) are a common feature of the urban landscape in major North American cities, including Toronto, Ontario. These spaces typically accompany urban developments that have requested modifications in planning regulations and represent a type of private-public partnership that is typical of neoliberal city planning policies. There have been limited studies on these spaces and how they may or may not contribute to urban health and wellbeing. There is a significant body of work suggesting that the built environment, especially of urban spaces, is a significant determinant of health and wellbeing of urban residents. Informed by the literature on green public space and health, I developed a framework to evaluate a random selection of 25 Toronto POPS. The three areas of POPS I chose to evaluate are: the level of green space and natural features, the use/functionality, and the accessibility of the space. I also explore what typologies of POPS are most common amongst the 25 spaces I examine. My findings suggest that Toronto POPS, at this time, do not meaningfully support the health and wellbeing of urban populations, as their level of greenery, use/functionality and accessibility is inconsistent and often of poor quality. However, in spite of these findings, there is abundant potential for POPS to become more conducive to urban health and wellbeing goals if the POPS Urban Design Guideline is sufficiently enforced and clarity is provided to whether or not POPS count as a “community benefit” under Section 37 negotiations. It is also recommended that the City of Toronto update their website on POPS, as the information is outdated, incomplete and inconsistent. Improving access to information about where POPS are located in the city may help these spaces be better utilized by members of the public.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Major Paper, Master of Environmental Studies, Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University

Collections