YorkSpace has migrated to a new version of its software. Access our Help Resources to learn how to use the refreshed site. Contact diginit@yorku.ca if you have any questions about the migration.
 

Natural Fiction and Artifice in Humes Treatise

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorTweyman, Stanley
dc.contributor.authorDelaney, Brent C.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-15T15:34:50Z
dc.date.available2021-11-15T15:34:50Z
dc.date.copyright2021-08
dc.date.issued2021-11-15
dc.date.updated2021-11-15T15:34:50Z
dc.degree.disciplineHumanities
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.description.abstractDavid Humes early philosophy appeals to fiction and artifice to explain several important features in our cognitive and social activity. The exact meaning of these concepts, however, remains ambiguous because of the unsystematic way in which Hume employs them. In this dissertation, I develop a typology of Humean fictions and artifices to clarify and render his account consistent. In so doing, I identify a special class of fictions I divide into (a) natural fictions and (b) natural artifices. I argue that this special class of cognitive and social fictions represent a significant break with prior English-speaking philosophers, such as Francis Bacon and John Locke, in so far as these fictions and artifices of the imagination are recognized as natural, irresistible, and pragmatically useful in human cognition and social activity. That fictions and artifices are naturally generated by the imagination in epistemic and moral contexts, I argue, is a watershed discovery in the history of philosophy. Indeed, it is a philosophical conclusion that poses serious, perhaps fatal, problems for philosophers who espouse thoroughgoing realist positions. More broadly, Humes pursuit of applying the experimental method to the moral subject reveals that human nature is mightily governed by the imagination, and that fictions and artifices are ubiquitous across the domains of science, morality, theology, logic, mathematics, and philosophy. For that reason, I suggest Hume ought to be recognized as a central figure in the history of philosophical fictionalism. Specifically, via a comparative analysis of Hume and Hans Vaihinger, I make the case that Hume functions as a vital link between Hobbes, Berkeley, and Kant in the development of early modern fictionalism.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/38741
dc.languageen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectPhilosophy of Religion
dc.subject.keywordsDavid Hume
dc.subject.keywordsFictionalism
dc.subject.keywordsFiction
dc.subject.keywordsImagination
dc.subject.keywordsRelations
dc.subject.keywordsA Treatise of Human Nature
dc.subject.keywordsHans Vaihinger
dc.subject.keywordsThe Philosophy of 'As if'
dc.subject.keywordsArtifices
dc.subject.keywordsSocial Fiction
dc.subject.keywordsEpistemic Fiction
dc.subject.keywordsCompleting the Union
dc.subject.keywordsIdentity
dc.subject.keywordsNecessity
dc.subject.keywordsUnity
dc.titleNatural Fiction and Artifice in Humes Treatise
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Delaney_Brent_C_2021_PhD.pdf
Size:
3.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.87 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
YorkU_ETDlicense.txt
Size:
3.39 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Humanities

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.