'The public' and planning in Toronto
| dc.contributor.advisor | Lehrer, Ute A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Galati, Nadia | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-29T00:27:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-06-29T00:27:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2018-06-29T00:27:04Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | As both a science and an art, planning is regulated by public policy, concerned with shaping and guiding the physical growth and arrangement of natural and built environments. Within these environments what is considered 'public' and how 'the public' is used in planning discourses and planning tools is based on constantly changing, socio-political contexts. Shaped by planning decisions, 'the public' often learns about transformations of urban space through stories in the media. These planning stories help 'the public' understand and relate to their physical environments by ascribing meaning to space. Through a case study of the Mirvish + Gehry development, this research substantiates the importance of telling a good story about 'the public' and 'the public good' in relation to development. Mirvish + Gehry invested heavily in telling their version of a planning story. By funding and staging numerous appearances, centred on the benefits of his development, Mirvish embodied his story and his development's brand by exercising his social leverage, capital, power and privilege, all of which afforded him the attention of the media and therefore 'the public'. In a Toronto context, place-based psychological ties to the community - like the Mirvish family history - are often found in discourses of legacy, art and the future. These ties have become useful tools for private and public development to build emotional connection to spatial environments. Both theoretically and in practice, planning stories help to build support and 'common-sense' application of future, public spaces, by leveraging current placebased attachments through neoliberal narratives in the media. Developers and politicians have realized the potential of partnering with arts communities, through growth coalitions, to tell more persuasive and poignant stories. As MP Adam Vaughan stated (Galati 2015c), it is the 'coolness factor' that arts and culture bring to development that helps it stand out in a fiercely competitive global market. | |
| dc.identifier | MESMP01905 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Major Paper, Master of Environmental Studies, Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10315/34655 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.rights | Author owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests. | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Planning | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Arts and Culture | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Participation | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Social Capital | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Power | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Equity | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Public Space | |
| dc.title | 'The public' and planning in Toronto | |
| dc.type | Major Paper |