Interrogating Safeguards Under the Mental Health Act: Criticizing the Decision in Thompson and Empowerment Council v. Ontario (2013): Towards an Alternative Understanding of Psychiatric Disability From the Perspectives of Critical Disability Theories and Crispitemology
| dc.contributor.advisor | da Silveira Gorman, Rachel | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Vorstermans, Jessica | |
| dc.contributor.author | Han, Yoonmee | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-06T23:10:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-07-06T23:10:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-11 | |
| dc.description | Major Research Paper (Master's), Critical Disability Studies, School of Health Policy and Management,Faculty of Health, York University | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10315/39524 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.rights | The copyright for the paper content remains with the author. | |
| dc.subject | Psychiatric disability | en_US |
| dc.subject | Critical disability theory | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cripistemology | en_US |
| dc.subject | Mental Health Act | en_US |
| dc.subject | Thompson and Empowerment Council v Ontario (2013) | en_US |
| dc.title | Interrogating Safeguards Under the Mental Health Act: Criticizing the Decision in Thompson and Empowerment Council v. Ontario (2013): Towards an Alternative Understanding of Psychiatric Disability From the Perspectives of Critical Disability Theories and Crispitemology | en_US |
| dc.type | Research Paper |