Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHutchinson, Allan C.
dc.creatorParmo, Domingo Andres Lovera
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-25T14:08:22Z
dc.date.available2016-11-25T14:08:22Z
dc.date.copyright2016-06-07
dc.date.issued2016-11-25
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/32725
dc.description.abstractThis research deals with a parcel of the protests that have been taking place over the last few years, particularly since 2010: those protests in which the protesters, instead of rebelling against the legitimacy of the system, have preferred to accept the regimes remaining in place and consequently have manifested their discontent via playing by the constitutional rules of the game. Although governmental responses have varied in degree, in the end they have all focused on limiting the right of the people to publicly assemble and express their views. As this work contends, when governments restrict protests (sometimes violently doing so) they ignore the fact that protests involve the exercise of rights and arbitrarily restrict the voices that shape constitutional understanding. By resorting to a mixture of theoretical and comparative approaches, this thesis argues that protests which manifest their acceptance of the regimes remaining in place have, when dealing with matters a lot of people care a lot, the potential of becoming popular interpretations of constitutions. The thesis is composed of three main argumentative lines. The first argumentative line rests on the sociology of social movements and from there proposes some conceptual definitions as to what playing by the rules means to social protests. The second argumentative line builds on a comparative analysis to show what constitutional rights are (usually) involved in protecting social protests and what other rights should be considered in enhancing that protection. Finally, the third argumentative line explains that accepting the regimes remaining in place poses politico-constitutional duties on both sides, that of the citizens and that of institutions. Whereas citizens find themselves committed to submitting their popular understandings to institutions, institutions are bound to open their venues and dialogue with (and not merely to be, depending on circumstances, influenced by) these popular contentions.
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectSociology
dc.titleSocial Protests as Constitutional Interpretation
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.degree.disciplineLaw
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.date.updated2016-11-25T14:08:22Z
dc.subject.keywordsConstitutional law
dc.subject.keywordsConstitutional interpretation
dc.subject.keywordsPopular constitutionalism
dc.subject.keywordsSocial protests
dc.subject.keywordsSocial movements
dc.subject.keywordsOccupy
dc.subject.keywordsIndignados


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.