Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Michael
dc.identifier.citationGilbert, M. A. (2004). Emotion, argumentation & informal logic. Informal Logic, 24(3).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe presence of emotion does not necessarily harm an argument. Emotion can play a role in traditional, logic-based theories of argumentation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipYork's Knowledge Mobilization Unit provides services and funding for faculty, graduate students, and community organizations seeking to maximize the impact of academic research and expertise on public policy, social programming, and professional practice. It is supported by SSHRC and CIHR grants, and by the Office of the Vice-President Research & Innovation. www.researchimpact.caen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canadaen_US
dc.titleEmotion Does Not Have to Cause Harm to an Argumenten_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada