Pelkey, JaminWalsh Matthews, StéphanieRicciardone, Sophia Marie2024-03-182024-03-182024-03-16https://hdl.handle.net/10315/41967The invisible entanglements of deep learning algorithms with political communication on social media platforms like Twitter have complicated political discourse and the formation of public opinion in the digital age. Consequently, as we engage with the content distributed on social media, it is difficult to know whether we are engaging with virtual peers or political bots. At the same time, the invisible interventions of bots also conceal the electioneering processes set in motion within political discourse on social media. Evidence has shown that because our minds cannot discern between tweets posted by human peers and those posted by bots, we intuitively engage with all tweets as though they were produced by social peers. Thus, the nature of our cognitive engagement with all tweets posted on social media conforms to the same social psychological principles that we engage when interacting with other social beings. Across this dissertation, I contend that the convergence of human thought, digital mediation, and digital electioneering creates distortions in logic on Twitter, resulting in a phenomenon I call botaganda. As the decussation of three different modes of reasoning infiltrate discourse within online spaces, the nature of discourse within public debate becomes convoluted, rendering human thought and public opinion vulnerable to the interference and manipulation of political actors. I aim to demonstrate that botaganda compromises the cogency and reliability of political communication in the digital age, but it is also the driving force behind the tenor of bipartisan incivility, politically motivated expression of moral outrage, and polarization of constituencies in the digital age. This dissertation also proposes that the political instrumentalization of deep learning algorithms on social media platforms to shape political discourse violates citizens’ fundamental rights to the freedom of thought, judgement, and conscience according to Section 2 the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.Author owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.Social psychologyMass communicationPolitical ScienceElectronic Thesis or Dissertation2024-03-16Digital CultureSocial MediaPoliticsElectioneeringAlgorithmsArtificial intelligenceCollaborative cognitionHjelmslevSemioticsInteraction alignment modelBarghGarrodPickeringPriming theorySemantic primingCognitive linguisticsCritical discourse analysisPosnerSemantic contagionPublic opinionPosthumanismHeuristicsMental schemasMental framesFraming theoryGlossematicsCorpus analysisTwitter