Hadlaw, Jan2019-07-022019-07-022019-03-012019-07-02http://hdl.handle.net/10315/36271The practice of design has become obscured by global networks of production, circulation, and consumption. Traditional design studies tend to focus on high-profile products, presenting heroic designers as the primary authors of works of design. This approach is inadequate for understanding design in the late-twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Contemporary design is better understood as an iterative and distributed process of give-and-take among actors, human and non-human, including people, tools, places, and ideas. It is a process that is influenced by conditions along the commodity chain that fall outside of the designers traditionally recognized sphere. This research demonstrates that commonly held conceptions of designers as sole authors and of design work as a largely intellectual, creative activity distanced from manufacturing, misrepresent the real practices and relations of design labour in the current global economy. Two object ethnographies follow the production, circulation, and consumption of everyday, mass-produced goods: the Vanessa steel-toe boot by Mellow Walk and the Non Stop flatware by Gourmet Settings. These case studies map networks of design labour across continents, countries, cities, and generations. Primary research includes 18 interviews, observations of environments and practices, and the analysis of material evidence. This process reveals actors whose contributions have typically been omitted from design history, and describes practices of design that contest traditional depictions of designers, design work, and evidence thereof. This research contributes a fuller and more accurate understanding of the range of creative labour and labourers involved in the design and development of goods for global markets while challenging the view of these goods as placeless and culture-free. I respond to the call by design historians to extend the scope of designs histories beyond the West, and I build on the work of design and creativity scholars who identify design thinking outside of recognized design roles. My work challenges established hierarchies of design, including who is permitted to design, which countries are perceived as superior sources of design and manufacturing expertise, and the hand-head dichotomy that underwrites how we think about design and that has been entrenched in traditional conceptions of manufacturing and the global division of labour. Understanding how the work of design is distributed and how it has changed in response to globalization gives insight into the politics of production and consumption.enAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.Electronic Thesis or Dissertation2019-07-02DesignDesign historyDesign studiesDesignerDesign practiceDesign processMaterial cultureEveryday designGlobalGlobalizationGlobal designGlobal commodity studiesGlobal value chainsGlobal commodity chainsActor Network TheoryProductionCirculationConsumptionDistributed authorshipCollaborative designCanadaCanadian designItalyItalian designMexicoMexican designVietnamVietnamese designChinaChinese designKoreaKorean designMass productionMass consumptionManufacturingGlobal economyEthnographyObject ethnographyDesign thinkingCreativityCreative labourDivision of labourCraftIndustrial upgradingFetishismNational identityMade in CanadaMade in AmericaMade in ChinaMade in MexicoMade in ItalyFootwearSafety bootsSafety shoesFlatwareCutleryStainless steelPost-industrialIndustrialIndustrial designGraphic designSystems designHolistic designWhole systems thinkingPackagingCore-peripheryVernacularBricolageIntellectual PropertyFactoryRetailMellow WalkGourmet Settings