Mykitiuk, RoxanneStevenson, Julianne Michelle2024-03-182024-03-182024-03-16https://hdl.handle.net/10315/41912While it is trite law in Canada that patients have the right to make their own medical decisions, news reports, regulatory complaints, and civil claims indicate that this right is failing to translate to delivery rooms. This thesis examines the gaps between the legal rights of birthing people in Canada as they exist “on the books” and the way those rights are experienced, using the critical theory of Law in Action. Building on feminist critiques of the traditional liberal conception of autonomy, this thesis conceptualizes childbirth as an experience deeply embedded in relations to others and concludes that to close the gaps between legal rights and lived experiences, we must craft law and policy in a manner that accounts for the broader relational context in which childbirth occurs.Author owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.LawElectronic Thesis or Dissertation2024-03-16Health lawHealthcareHuman rightsBirthChildbirthLabourPregnancyRelational autonomyAutonomyConsentDignitySelf-determinationRestorative justiceReproductive rightsObstetric violenceObstetricsObstetricianMidwiferyMidwivesPhysicianCaesarean sectionC-sectionVaginal deliveryBirth plansHome birthFree birthNewbornFetusBirthing peopleWomenBirth evacuationBirth alertCanada Health ActCanada