Interrogating Safeguards Under the Mental Health Act: Criticizing the Decision in Thompson and Empowerment Council v. Ontario (2013): Towards an Alternative Understanding of Psychiatric Disability From the Perspectives of Critical Disability Theories and Crispitemology

da Silveira Gorman, RachelVorstermans, JessicaHan, Yoonmee2022-07-062022-07-062021-11http://hdl.handle.net/10315/39524Major Research Paper (Master's), Critical Disability Studies, School of Health Policy and Management,Faculty of Health, York UniversityenThe copyright for the paper content remains with the author.Psychiatric disabilityCritical disability theoryCripistemologyMental Health ActThompson and Empowerment Council v Ontario (2013)Interrogating Safeguards Under the Mental Health Act: Criticizing the Decision in Thompson and Empowerment Council v. Ontario (2013): Towards an Alternative Understanding of Psychiatric Disability From the Perspectives of Critical Disability Theories and CrispitemologyResearch Paper