mirage

Pre-emptive lumbar epidural anaesthesia reduces postoperative pain and patient-controlled morphine consumption after lower abdominal surgery

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Pre-emptive lumbar epidural anaesthesia reduces postoperative pain and patient-controlled morphine consumption after lower abdominal surgery

Show full item record

Title: Pre-emptive lumbar epidural anaesthesia reduces postoperative pain and patient-controlled morphine consumption after lower abdominal surgery
Author: Katz, Joel; Clairoux, Michel; Kavanagh, Brian P.; Roger, Sandra; Nierenberg, Hilary; Redahan, Cormac; Sandler, Alan N.
Abstract: The present study tested the hypothesis that patients receiving epidural bupivacaine before surgery would require less morphine postoperatively and/or report less intense pain than patients receiving epidural bupivacaine after incision but before the end of surgery. Forty-two patients (ASA class I-III) scheduled for lower abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups of equal size and prospectively studied using a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design. Epidural catheters were placed in the T12-L1 or L1-L2 interspaces pre-operatively, the position of the catheter was confirmed with 3% chloroprocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000, and sensory testing was carried out until levels had receded to below T12. Group 1 received 15 ml of 0.5% epidural bupivacaine injected 35 min before incision followed by 15 ml of epidural normal saline 30 min after incision. Group 2 received 15 ml of epidural normal saline injected 37 min before incision followed by 15 ml of 0.5% epidural bupivacaine 30 min after incision. General anaesthesia was induced with thiopental (4–6 mg/kg) and maintained with N2O/O2 and isoflurane. Paralysis was achieved with pancuronium (0.1 mg/kg). Opioids were not used as pre-medication or during surgery. Postoperative analgesia consisted of patient-controlled (PCA) intravenous morphine. Visual analogue pain scores (VAS) (at rest and after standardized mobilization) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups but McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) pain ratings were significantly lower in group 1 at the 24 and 72 h assessments. Group 1 used significantly less morphine than did group 2 between 12 and 24 h after surgery. Cumulative PCA morphine consumption in group 1 (55.2 ± 4.7 mg) was significantly lower than in group 2 (71.7 ± 6.1 mg) 24 h and 48 h (group 1: 86.8 ± 6.3 mg vs. group 2: 108.9 ± 9.8 mg) after surgery, but not at the 72 h assessment. Reduction in morphine dose at 24, 48 and 72 h amounted to 30%, 25% and 22%, respectively. The results suggest that single-shot pre-emptive epidural local anaesthesia is associated with a short-term morphine-sparing effect which is most pronounced between 12 and 24 h after surgery. Extending the pre-operative blockade into the postoperative period may prolong the initial advantage conferred by pre-emptive epidural local anaesthesia.
Subject: Inflammation
abdominal; Pre-emptive analgesia
Morphine; Surgery
Patient-controlled analgesia
Epidural bupivacaine
Type: Article
Rights: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6T0K-485P2X9-11-1&_cdi=4865&_user=866177&_pii=0304395994900264&_origin=gateway&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F1994&_sk=999409996&view=c&wchp=dGLzVtz-zSkzV&md5=72d2dc8ae115f368cadf237da02b7470&ie=/sdarticle.pdf
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/506083/description#description
http://www.elsevier.com
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10315/7936
Published: Elsevier
Citation: Pain, 59(3), 395-403. (1994)
Date: 1994

Files in this item



This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search YorkSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account