<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>YCISS Research</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10315/1303" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10315/1303</id>
<updated>2013-05-24T15:56:15Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-05-24T15:56:15Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>A Survey of Game Theory Models on Peace and War</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10315/1425" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>O'Neill, Barry</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10315/1425</id>
<updated>2013-05-22T20:31:20Z</updated>
<published>1990-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Survey of Game Theory Models on Peace and War
O'Neill, Barry
This paper will present a survey of game theoretical applications to peace and war relevant to the continuing debate on the theory's place. (Some contributions are by Deutsch, 1954, 1968; Waltz, 1959; Quandt, 1961; Snyder, 1961; Shubik, 1968; Robinson, 1970; Rosenau, 1971; Junne, 1972; George and Smoke, 1974; Plon, 1976; Martin, 1978; Wagner, 1983; Maoz, 1985; Snidal, 1985a; Hardin, 1986; Larson, 1987; Jervis, 1988a; O'Neill, 1989b; and Rapoport, 1989.) The review will be non evaluative, and will focus on the areas chosen for applications rather than developments in the mathematics. It will be fairly comprehensive in the international relations (IR) section, and include the main subjects in the military operations part. In regard to IR, I examine the mutual influences of the mathematics and the conventional theory or policy questions. The military section notes the interaction of game applications with new military strategy and technology. A companion paper (O'Neill, 1990b) surveys introductory writings for each game theory subfield that might be relevant to IR.
</summary>
<dc:date>1990-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Completing Europe's Internal Market: Implications for Canadian Policy</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10315/1424" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Mutimer, David</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10315/1424</id>
<updated>2013-05-22T19:22:50Z</updated>
<published>1990-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Completing Europe's Internal Market: Implications for Canadian Policy
Mutimer, David
The 1992 project in Europe promises to be one of the most significant developments of the contemporary international political economy, and Canadians need to be ready to meet the challenges and opportunities it presents. The focus of the present paper is to consider these challenges and Canada's response from the perspective of government trade policy. While obviously industry will need to consider the specific effects of the 1992 project, it is for the government to set the broad goals for the Canadian economy in light of a changed international environment. This paper's object is to examine, first of all, the recent patterns of the trading relations between Canada and the EC, and the current trade policy of the Canadian government, and thus the expectations Canada has for the future of this trading relationship. Having considered the context of the trading relationship, the project to complete the internal market by 1992 will be examined. The paper will then consider the expectations and the likely results of the programme, and how these results will influence Canada's position. Finally, a set of conclusions will be drawn from this analysis for the conduct of Canadian trade in the face of 1992.
</summary>
<dc:date>1990-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Institutional Change and the New European Politics: The European Community, European Political Cooperation and the Western European Union</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10315/1423" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Mutimer, David</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10315/1423</id>
<updated>2013-05-22T18:35:24Z</updated>
<published>1990-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Institutional Change and the New European Politics: The European Community, European Political Cooperation and the Western European Union
Mutimer, David
The object of this paper is to examine a small section of these political questions. There are several pressures building for a more united and independent Western Europe. The market completion will almost certainly result in a more politically united Community. The lessening of East-West tensions and the growth of West-West tensions are already impelling Europe to take a more independent and unified approach to its foreign and security policy. If Europe is to respond to these pressures and begin pursuing European policies in its foreign and security affairs, there will need to be an institutional focus for such policy. There are already institutions in place, which are designed to provide fora for the consideration of these very policy areas. The European Political Cooperation (EPC) is an intergovernmental body whose function is to coordinate the foreign policies of the members of the EC in order to work toward a European foreign policy. In addition, the Western European Union (WEU) was originally founded to act as a focus for the development and execution of a European security policy. While the WEU had fallen into obscurity, it is still available and, in fact, has been recently reactivated. The central question of this discussion, therefore, is what role can be foreseen for the European Political Cooperation and the Western European Union in the new European politics.
</summary>
<dc:date>1990-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Survey of Military Cooperation among ASEAN States: Bilateralism or Alliance?</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10315/1421" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Acharya, Amitav</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10315/1421</id>
<updated>2013-05-22T17:38:38Z</updated>
<published>1990-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Survey of Military Cooperation among ASEAN States: Bilateralism or Alliance?
Acharya, Amitav
The question of whether a military/security arrangement binding the ASEAN states, if it is to take place, should be constructed within or outside the formal framework of ASEAN itself remains an open and thorny issue. But the issue itself has received little systematic treatment in the literature on Southeast Asian regional security. This is largely due to two factors: a general unwillingness among policymakers in the ASEAN states to release information on military matters in the name of national security, and second, the political sensitivity surrounding the specific subject of intra-ASEAN military links. As a result, debates on ASEAN security and defence cooperation have been marred by a paucity of reliable information. This paper, based on extensive primary research, is intended to fill the information gap and facilitate efforts by scholars towards more conceptual generalizations on the subject.
</summary>
<dc:date>1990-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
